Despite the return of his wifes illness, John Edwards has announced that he plans to stays on the campaign. "The campaign goes on. The campaign goes on strongly," Edwards told reporters, his wife by his side.
It will be interesting to see, how is wifes progressing cancer play out along the campaign trail. I believe, depending on how fast it progresses, it could become an issue for the campaign. Edwards will want to be by his wife side, and we could potentially see him dropping out of the race in the next several months.
What do you think?
Friday, March 23, 2007
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Partisan Fishing Expedition
As Karl Rove and other top administration officials are being subpoenaed, I tend to look at the political motives of the Democrats in office.
I feel as if I agree with the congress as they assert their power over the President. The 2006 mid-term election did give them the power to do so. However I think that they are trying to look for things to complain about.
I think President Bush's offer, to allow administration officials to be interviewed behind closed doors and not on tape was a satisfactory offer.
The Associated Press says, Bush had sought to avoid the "media spectacle" that would result from public hearings with Rove and others at the witness table.
I happen to agree with the President that the Democrats in some ways are trying to make the Republican party look worse then they already do.
"The question they've got to ask themselves is, are you more interested in a political spectacle than getting the truth?" Tony Snow said Tuesday, I agree with the position the White House has taken on this issue.
I also agree that the U.S. Congress has the right to do its job by performing oversight over the administration, however they are going about it in the wrong way.
What do you think?
I feel as if I agree with the congress as they assert their power over the President. The 2006 mid-term election did give them the power to do so. However I think that they are trying to look for things to complain about.
I think President Bush's offer, to allow administration officials to be interviewed behind closed doors and not on tape was a satisfactory offer.
The Associated Press says, Bush had sought to avoid the "media spectacle" that would result from public hearings with Rove and others at the witness table.
I happen to agree with the President that the Democrats in some ways are trying to make the Republican party look worse then they already do.
"The question they've got to ask themselves is, are you more interested in a political spectacle than getting the truth?" Tony Snow said Tuesday, I agree with the position the White House has taken on this issue.
I also agree that the U.S. Congress has the right to do its job by performing oversight over the administration, however they are going about it in the wrong way.
What do you think?
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Salt Lake City Mayor calls for Bush Impeachment
Read the full story here.
My view on the impeachment of a President especially this President is that one needs to look beyond today. What I mean is that if we impeach President Bush we will then have President Cheney, who may be worse.
The main issue I have with the impeachment process is that it clearly is a waste of time, energy, and tax-dollars. Congress will spend weeks on this issue rather than focusing on issues that are really going to make a difference.
Impeaching a President who was fairly elected by the people of this country in 2004, in my opinion makes America look weak and unstable.
I have taken a moment to remember what it was like during the process for President Clinton. All I can remember is Anna Nicole (R.I.P) type coverage, this over hyped, MTV style coverage of something that is not going to do anything to change Americas future. It would only help take the focus of the American people away from more important issues, like the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
People who say "if George Bush lost in 2004 we would be out of Iraq," first off you cant make a claim like that because it neither true nor false. As well even if an anti-war candidate is elected in 2008, we will only see a change in strategy not a complete withdrawal. This is not a war America and the world can afford to lose.
What do you think?
My view on the impeachment of a President especially this President is that one needs to look beyond today. What I mean is that if we impeach President Bush we will then have President Cheney, who may be worse.
The main issue I have with the impeachment process is that it clearly is a waste of time, energy, and tax-dollars. Congress will spend weeks on this issue rather than focusing on issues that are really going to make a difference.
Impeaching a President who was fairly elected by the people of this country in 2004, in my opinion makes America look weak and unstable.
I have taken a moment to remember what it was like during the process for President Clinton. All I can remember is Anna Nicole (R.I.P) type coverage, this over hyped, MTV style coverage of something that is not going to do anything to change Americas future. It would only help take the focus of the American people away from more important issues, like the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
People who say "if George Bush lost in 2004 we would be out of Iraq," first off you cant make a claim like that because it neither true nor false. As well even if an anti-war candidate is elected in 2008, we will only see a change in strategy not a complete withdrawal. This is not a war America and the world can afford to lose.
What do you think?
Blog The Vote- Obama anti-Hillary You Tube Video
Sen. Barack Obama denied involvement last night on Larry King Live when asked about a video posted on the popular website You Tube, about Sen. Hillary Clinton.
"We knew nothing about it. I just saw it for the first time," Obama said to Larry King "And you know one of the things about the Internet is that people generate all kinds of stuff. In some ways it's the democratization of the campaign process."
To me the video does not look like a campaign advertisement, rather it looks like someone had to much time on their hands. The video can be seen here.
Update 7:43 am Chris Cillizza at The Fix, blogs about the impact of the technology in Presidential elections, here The YouTube Effect (Part XIII).
"We knew nothing about it. I just saw it for the first time," Obama said to Larry King "And you know one of the things about the Internet is that people generate all kinds of stuff. In some ways it's the democratization of the campaign process."
To me the video does not look like a campaign advertisement, rather it looks like someone had to much time on their hands. The video can be seen here.
Update 7:43 am Chris Cillizza at The Fix, blogs about the impact of the technology in Presidential elections, here The YouTube Effect (Part XIII).
Monday, March 19, 2007
Blog The Vote- Obama and Israel
Ben Smith over at the Politco wrote a good article Obama's Rhetoric Chills Some Supporters of Israel.
I think Sen. Obama needs to begin to start working on his wording of what he says. According to his voting record, Sen. Obama has always supported the American-Israel strategic alliance.
I do believe however he needs start thinking about what he says, the pro-Israel community is a strong voting body as well as a strong financial group and most candidates would not like to lose that support. As well if a candidate loses the support of the pro-Israel community, it is likely to lead to the loss of the majority of the Jewish community.
Obama's comments, including "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people" as a result of the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, in the Des Moines Register. Have really hurt the senator, he needs to begin recognizing the fact that the citizens of Israel are not living in peace and prosperity. Those in the north continue to rebuild, after thousand of rockets destroyed homes that were standing centuries, citizen riding buses to work continue to question if they will make it home at the end of the day.
Anybody who can confidently say that the Palestinian people are suffering more than Israeli is blind to the facts. Both groups are not gaining from this conflict they are both suffering. The problem is that the suffering of the Palestinians is due to the Palestinian government lack of control of its own people.
You cannot blame Israel for the fact that millions of dollars in aide was held back by Yassar Arafat from his own people. The Palestinian government has kept their people in "refugee" camps since the state of Israel was created because it make them look like victims. They are no longer victims. Keeping them in refugee camps enables the Palestinian Authority to continue to blame Israel for the problems of the Palestinian people.
Billion of dollars in foreign aide continues to be kept from the Palestinian government in order to get them to stop working with terrorists groups, like Hamas. The new "unity" government is not going to do anything. Any government that includes a terrorist group, or calls for the destruction of another sovereign state, should not receive aide from other nations.
What do you think?
I think Sen. Obama needs to begin to start working on his wording of what he says. According to his voting record, Sen. Obama has always supported the American-Israel strategic alliance.
I do believe however he needs start thinking about what he says, the pro-Israel community is a strong voting body as well as a strong financial group and most candidates would not like to lose that support. As well if a candidate loses the support of the pro-Israel community, it is likely to lead to the loss of the majority of the Jewish community.
Obama's comments, including "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people" as a result of the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, in the Des Moines Register. Have really hurt the senator, he needs to begin recognizing the fact that the citizens of Israel are not living in peace and prosperity. Those in the north continue to rebuild, after thousand of rockets destroyed homes that were standing centuries, citizen riding buses to work continue to question if they will make it home at the end of the day.
Anybody who can confidently say that the Palestinian people are suffering more than Israeli is blind to the facts. Both groups are not gaining from this conflict they are both suffering. The problem is that the suffering of the Palestinians is due to the Palestinian government lack of control of its own people.
You cannot blame Israel for the fact that millions of dollars in aide was held back by Yassar Arafat from his own people. The Palestinian government has kept their people in "refugee" camps since the state of Israel was created because it make them look like victims. They are no longer victims. Keeping them in refugee camps enables the Palestinian Authority to continue to blame Israel for the problems of the Palestinian people.
Billion of dollars in foreign aide continues to be kept from the Palestinian government in order to get them to stop working with terrorists groups, like Hamas. The new "unity" government is not going to do anything. Any government that includes a terrorist group, or calls for the destruction of another sovereign state, should not receive aide from other nations.
What do you think?
Thursday, March 15, 2007
American Israel Public Affairs Committee- On my way to the hill!
Reuben Ingber, Joe Lieberman, Mrs. Lieberman
Reuben Ingber on the AIPAC Stage
Brian Tregerman (Albany Student), Sen. Joe Biden, Reuben
Sen. Sam Brownback, Reuben Ingber
Reuben Ingber on the hillBlog The Vote- Candidates Woo Firefighters
Yesterday, Sen. Clinton, Sen. Obama, Sen. Biden, and Dodd all spoke to firefighters at the International Association of Fire Fighters(IAFF), Presidential forum.
Both Sen. Clinton and Obama were well received, however the tier two candidates, Biden and Dodd were the stars of this show. Biden and Dodd spoke the language of the over 1,000 white-male attendees, according to one union official they spoke in "red-meat and a six-pack" rhetoric.
Over the weekend, I was able to meet Joe Biden, and I think as second tier candidate I believe he may have a shot if he can fundraise his way to the top tier. He has a lot of great ideas and great passion as a Presidential candidate.
It is important to see that the core of American voters are white-males and that I think will play a very big role. Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama are both candidates that I do not think most white males will continue to open up to. They may look to other candidates like John Edwards and Joe Biden.
Both Sen. Clinton and Obama were well received, however the tier two candidates, Biden and Dodd were the stars of this show. Biden and Dodd spoke the language of the over 1,000 white-male attendees, according to one union official they spoke in "red-meat and a six-pack" rhetoric.
Over the weekend, I was able to meet Joe Biden, and I think as second tier candidate I believe he may have a shot if he can fundraise his way to the top tier. He has a lot of great ideas and great passion as a Presidential candidate.
It is important to see that the core of American voters are white-males and that I think will play a very big role. Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama are both candidates that I do not think most white males will continue to open up to. They may look to other candidates like John Edwards and Joe Biden.
Friday, March 09, 2007
House Legislation Comes With a Catch
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D - Calif.) and gang have come up with a plan to pay for Iraq, which includes a plan to bring the troops back home. The White House has already exclaimed that they will veto this legislation even through it grants President Bush the much needed funding he has asked for Iraq. Sticking to his guns, the President will not allow Congress to set a timetable for Iraq. Supporters of the notion say it will cause failure in Iraq, and that simply will be a win for the terrorists.
The Democrats know very well that it will be close to impossible to override a veto with their slim majority in the Senate. Then why do they continuously waste time on bills they know will be vetoed? To make a point? Certainly, now they'll have a track record to show their support to bring troops back in time for the 2008 elections. As a wise man once told me, the job of an elected official, is to get elected.
Waste of time? Or are they sincerely working for the best interests of the people?
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Dear Readers,
It has been a very difficult week at school and that is why I have not been posting. However this weekend I will be back in business, reporting live from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference in Washington. There will be pictures and hopefully interviews with several people who are attending the conference.
It has been a very difficult week at school and that is why I have not been posting. However this weekend I will be back in business, reporting live from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference in Washington. There will be pictures and hopefully interviews with several people who are attending the conference.
Monday, March 05, 2007
Blog the Vote - Don't Forget the Hispanics
Just this past weekend Presidential Candidates Barack Obama (D-IL) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY) paid homage to civil rights activists in Selma, Alabama. Trying to garner what has been a tug-of-war for the black vote, these democratic candidates are forgetting another essential group - the Papi's. As you may have heard, the Hispanic population in the US has surpassed the black population. Then why are these candidates still fighting for the black votes? Both groups have similar turnouts at presidential elections. The next presidential election may be even more motivating for the Hispanics with the issue of immigration still on the table that may result in a higher turnout.
Democratic Presidential Candidate Bill Richardson, the only candidate with ties to a Hispanic background, has managed to keep a low profile thus-far. But his popularity may only grow over time. Remember, the past few elections have shown how the front-runners, come election time are no longer in the running.
Do you think it's critical to focus on the hispanic vote?
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Blog The Vote- Giuliani appointed Democratic Judges
The Politico Reports:
When Rudy Giuliani faces Republicans concerned about his support of gay rights and legal abortion, he reassures them that he is a conservative on the decisions that matter most.
"I would want judges who are strict constructionists because I am," he told South Carolina Republicans last month. "Those are the kinds of justices I would appoint -- Scalia, Alito and Roberts."
But most of Giuliani's judicial appointments during his eight years as mayor of New York were hardly in the model of Chief Justice John Roberts or Samuel Alito -- much less aggressive conservatives in the mold of Antonin Scalia.
I do not believe that Giuliani will ever be able to use his resume as a way to back his candidacy for the Republican nomination. Being a republican in New York is basically like being a Democrat across the rest of the country. Giuliani will never fit the national Republican-Conservative mold, and in order to win in a primary you need to fit that mold.
Political Cartoon-"The Worlds Local Bank"
This cartoon reminds of my issue with HSBC, a bank which calls itself "The Worlds Local Bank." At the "worlds local bank," I expect to get my answers from someone locally who can speak English well, I no I am not perfect when it comes to grammar. However, I am fully able to hold a conversation without stumbling. When I call the "worlds local bank," I ask myself why can't I speak to someone who is capable of speaking proper english?People claim that they do this in order to provide 24-hour support, in order to account for the time difference. Well, why can't I speak to an American between the hours of 8 am to 8 pm.
What do you think?
Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid Update
12:02 AM--Senator McCain has officially announced his bid for President on David Letterman. A more formal announcement will happen on his tour in April.
As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.
A video will be posted shortly.
As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.
A video will be posted shortly.
Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid Update
12:02 AM--Senator McCain has officially announced his bid for President on David Letterman. A more formal announcement will happen on his tour in April.
As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.
As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid
Republican Sen. John McCain will officially enter the presidential race his second run after a bitter loss to George W. Bush in 2000 with a formal announcement in early April.
The Arizona senator disclosed the timing of the long-expected announcement in a taping for the “Late Show With David Letterman” on CBS for airing Wednesday night.
“I am announcing that I will be a candidate for president of the United States,” the senator told the talk show host and then added he would give a formal speech to that effect in early April. Read the full story here.
Democrats Disunion
The Politico says that several Democrats are upset with the way Democratic leaders have handled Iraq war policy.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday postponed for at least a week action on a Democratic plan to rewrite the 2002 congressional resolution authorizing the war, imposing new wartime restrictions on the administration.
Sen. Ben Nelson, a conservative Democrat from Nebraska, said the new Democratic strategy could unfairly hamstring the president and military commanders. "I think it is very difficult to start changing things after the fact and still avoid micromanaging the war."
And Sen. Russ Feingold, a liberal Democrat from Wisconsin, criticized the latest Democratic strategy as too timid and toothless in stopping the war. Approving a new authorization resolution would be the same "as voting for a new Iraq war and that I am not going to do."
This is the problem with the Democratic party, they are not united in their goals and aspirations. Some Democrats would like to cut funding for the war, others want a time table et cetera. In order to achieve anything Democrats need to come together under one banner. Their disunion is only going to hurt them in the long run.
What do you think?
"Better late than never."
"Better late than never," said Leon E. Panetta, a onetime White House chief of staff who served on the Iraq Study Group, when she was asked about scheduled regional conference with Iraq two neighbors Syria and Iran.
The United States where also invited to these talks however will not be the ones running the talks. However, the Iraqi government has called the meeting and will head the meetings, contrary to the recommendations of the panel.
Democrats heralded the plan as a needed change in policy. Sen. Joseph R. Biden said, that "the administration is right to reverse itself and engage Iran and Syria on Iraq. Right now they're a big part of the problem, but they have an interest in becoming part of the solution to prevent chaos in Iraq."
Personally I feel that this is good on many levels. The first is that it shows that the United States recognizes the problems which exist in Syria and Iran and that we will need to help to fix the problem in a diplomatic way. The second and more important is that the Iraqi government is taking a primary role in these talks. It shows that the Iraqi government wants to take control of their country.
What do you think?
The United States where also invited to these talks however will not be the ones running the talks. However, the Iraqi government has called the meeting and will head the meetings, contrary to the recommendations of the panel.
Democrats heralded the plan as a needed change in policy. Sen. Joseph R. Biden said, that "the administration is right to reverse itself and engage Iran and Syria on Iraq. Right now they're a big part of the problem, but they have an interest in becoming part of the solution to prevent chaos in Iraq."
Personally I feel that this is good on many levels. The first is that it shows that the United States recognizes the problems which exist in Syria and Iran and that we will need to help to fix the problem in a diplomatic way. The second and more important is that the Iraqi government is taking a primary role in these talks. It shows that the Iraqi government wants to take control of their country.
What do you think?
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Joe Lieberman Part II
Well I think Sen. Lieberman is a really smart, although I do not believe he will ever switch political parties, I feel he is bluffing. I think however he is using his position, as an independent to ensure that the congress continues to support our troops.
The Democrats would be crazy to call his bluff, they do not under any circumstances want to lose their majority status in the Senate. Lieberman knows this fact very well and has used it to his advantage.
What do you think?
The Democrats would be crazy to call his bluff, they do not under any circumstances want to lose their majority status in the Senate. Lieberman knows this fact very well and has used it to his advantage.
What do you think?
ACCORDING TO THE POLITICO: Lieberman Says War Vote Could Prompt Party Switch
The Politico Reports:
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut told the Politico Thursday that he has no immediate plans to switch parties, but suggested Democratic opposition to funding the war in Iraq might change his mind.
Lieberman, a registered independent who caucuses with Democrats, has been among the strongest supporters of the war and President Bush’s plan to send another 21,500 combat troops into Iraq to help quell the violence there.
"I have no desire to change parties," Lieberman said in a telephone interview. "If that ever happens, it is because I feel the majority of Democrats have gone in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with."
Asked whether that hasn't already happened with Iraq, Lieberman said: "We will see how that plays out in the coming months," specifically how the party approaches the issue of continued funding for the war.
He suggested, however, that the forthcoming showdown over new funding could be a deciding factor that would lure him to the Republican Party.
"I hope we don't get to that point," Lieberman said. "That's about all I will say on it today. That would hurt."
Republicans have long targeted Lieberman to switch – a move that would give them control of the Senate. And Time magazine is set to report Friday that there is a “remote” chance Lieberman would join the GOP.
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut told the Politico Thursday that he has no immediate plans to switch parties, but suggested Democratic opposition to funding the war in Iraq might change his mind.
Lieberman, a registered independent who caucuses with Democrats, has been among the strongest supporters of the war and President Bush’s plan to send another 21,500 combat troops into Iraq to help quell the violence there.
"I have no desire to change parties," Lieberman said in a telephone interview. "If that ever happens, it is because I feel the majority of Democrats have gone in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with."
Asked whether that hasn't already happened with Iraq, Lieberman said: "We will see how that plays out in the coming months," specifically how the party approaches the issue of continued funding for the war.
He suggested, however, that the forthcoming showdown over new funding could be a deciding factor that would lure him to the Republican Party.
"I hope we don't get to that point," Lieberman said. "That's about all I will say on it today. That would hurt."
Republicans have long targeted Lieberman to switch – a move that would give them control of the Senate. And Time magazine is set to report Friday that there is a “remote” chance Lieberman would join the GOP.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Blog The Vote- Romney 1st Campaign Ad
The 60 second advertisement will air in Florida, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Johnathan Martin at the Politico has the full story.
Great Britian withdraws troops from Iraq
This morning Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister, announced that they will begin with drawing British troops from the southern region of Iraq.
I continue to support the war in Iraq, however as more of our allies begin to pull their troops out, we are no longer fighting a global war on terror but an American war on terror which makes no sense. When we went into Vietnam, we went with a strong coalition which shared the economic costs, life costs, and military costs, in fact the United States made money. The fact of the matter is though that this is not a war that can be solved through a two state division of Iraq, it must end with a "peaceful" and "stable" Iraq. If we cannot help the Iraqi government to accomplish that then there is no hope for peace and stability in the Middle East.
I continue to support the war in Iraq, however as more of our allies begin to pull their troops out, we are no longer fighting a global war on terror but an American war on terror which makes no sense. When we went into Vietnam, we went with a strong coalition which shared the economic costs, life costs, and military costs, in fact the United States made money. The fact of the matter is though that this is not a war that can be solved through a two state division of Iraq, it must end with a "peaceful" and "stable" Iraq. If we cannot help the Iraqi government to accomplish that then there is no hope for peace and stability in the Middle East.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Blog The Vote- Romney supports "don't ask, don't tell"
The Washington Post reports:
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R), who once advocated allowing gays to serve openly in the military, said yesterday that he does not think the Pentagon should change its "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the midst of the Iraq war." 'Don't ask, don't tell' has worked well. We're in the middle of a conflict. Now is not the time for a change in that regard, and I don't have a policy posture as to allowing gays in the military to serve there openly," Romney, a presidential candidate, said on ABC's "This Week."
This is why I don't like Mitt Romney as a Republican candidate for President. He is not standing by what he has been saying, he is continuously changing his opinion on the social issues which drive American voters. People tend to care less for important political issues like education funding, defense policies, et cetera and care more about issue that impact their everyday life. Romney is doing the same thing that John Kerry did in 2004 flip-flopping and it will cause his demise for the nomination.
Blog The Vote- McCain hits the campaign trail hard
Over the weekend Sen. John McCain hit the campaign trail harder than he had in his 2000 campaign. He spent the weekend in predominantly in Iowa and South Carolina.
For most of the weekend he spent combating question on the Iraq Policy which he has promoted for years and now is held hostage by. McCain has spent the past several years urging congress and the President to increase the number of troops in Iraq, saying that it is our only option for victory and an end to the war.
Now that the President has put that plan into action for McCains sake it must work. Otherwise his aspirations for 2008 have been shot down.
The other major topic impacting the Republican race is abortion. Other contenders, like the pro-choice Giuliani and born-again pro-life Romney, do not sit well with the majority of Republican voters who are opposed to abortion and think that legislation needs to be passed prohibiting it.
McCain on the other hand came out this weekend in front of a large crowd in South Carolina saying that he wants to see Roe v. Wade overturned.
I feel that McCain is the Republicans best chance at victory in 2008. The other two front runners, Romney and Giuliani do not have the same political backing that McCain has. He has been on the national stage for many years and his experience far outweighs them.
For most of the weekend he spent combating question on the Iraq Policy which he has promoted for years and now is held hostage by. McCain has spent the past several years urging congress and the President to increase the number of troops in Iraq, saying that it is our only option for victory and an end to the war.
Now that the President has put that plan into action for McCains sake it must work. Otherwise his aspirations for 2008 have been shot down.
The other major topic impacting the Republican race is abortion. Other contenders, like the pro-choice Giuliani and born-again pro-life Romney, do not sit well with the majority of Republican voters who are opposed to abortion and think that legislation needs to be passed prohibiting it.
McCain on the other hand came out this weekend in front of a large crowd in South Carolina saying that he wants to see Roe v. Wade overturned.
I feel that McCain is the Republicans best chance at victory in 2008. The other two front runners, Romney and Giuliani do not have the same political backing that McCain has. He has been on the national stage for many years and his experience far outweighs them.
Blog the Vote-Information
For the best and most up to the minute campaign coverage check out The Politico, its a new site and DC newspaper. It is in my opinion the best in Politics coverage.
Rice at the Middle East Summit
CNN.com reports:
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice held "productive" talks Monday with Israeli and Palestinian leaders and said she expects more negotiations in a bid to restart the Mideast peace process.Rice called the meeting "productive and useful," I consider them a waste of money and time at this point. Until the Palestinian "government" recognizes Israels right to exist and renounces violence the Middle East will continue to be at the stalemate its been in for years. Until that happens Israel has the right to be on the defensive against terrorism and any threat that may arise. These meeting are meant to make progress, all I see is a continuation of lies.
Rice's meeting Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas came amid concerns about whether a new Palestinian unity government will renounce terrorism and recognize Israel.
Friday, February 16, 2007
Informed Students
Dear Readers,
The blizzard up in Albany, NY where I attend school, has interupted my internet connection. I finally have it again and hope to get some posts up today or tomorrow from home. Keep reading the blog, this weekends Senate vote on the Iraq resolution will be very interesting especially as interrupts campaigning for the ALL the 2008 hopefuls. I will be sure to keep you posted of the developments through the weekend.
The question I pose to all of you is what do you think of the Iraq resolution? Will it do anything?
The blizzard up in Albany, NY where I attend school, has interupted my internet connection. I finally have it again and hope to get some posts up today or tomorrow from home. Keep reading the blog, this weekends Senate vote on the Iraq resolution will be very interesting especially as interrupts campaigning for the ALL the 2008 hopefuls. I will be sure to keep you posted of the developments through the weekend.
The question I pose to all of you is what do you think of the Iraq resolution? Will it do anything?
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Political Cartoon on Slate.com
I found this one and it pretty much says what I am expecting tonight as far as weather goes. LOTS OF SNOW, HERE IN ALBANY!!!
Gov. Romney Enters the Race
Mitt Romney stood in front of a large crowd in Michigan at the Henry Ford Museum to announce his candidacy for President. After the announcement Romney will kick off a four day six-state announcement tour, where he will try to boost his credentials with conservative voters. Romney's, religious views as a Mormon will affect his campaign.
Romney talked about Henry Fords innovation and how that had changed America forever, as well continued innovation will change us forever. "Innovation and transformation has been at the heart of American success" and it is needed in American government now more than ever. "It is time for innovation and transformation in Washington," Romney said he continued on with this theme and how Washington needs to be changed from the outside by people who have experienced the real world.
With his family at his side, Romney said that he "declared his intention to run for President of the United States."
Romney talked about Henry Fords innovation and how that had changed America forever, as well continued innovation will change us forever. "Innovation and transformation has been at the heart of American success" and it is needed in American government now more than ever. "It is time for innovation and transformation in Washington," Romney said he continued on with this theme and how Washington needs to be changed from the outside by people who have experienced the real world.
With his family at his side, Romney said that he "declared his intention to run for President of the United States."
Romeny announces his bid for President
A little after 9 a.m. Former Gov. Mitt Romney is expected to announced his run for president.
House votes on Iraq
The House of Representatives will debate a resolution opposing the Bush build up of troops. In short the resolution says that congress oppose the increase of US troops but will continue to support the troops in Iraq.
The Democratic resolution, just 10 lines in length, will frame three days of debate on the war, culminating in an expected vote Friday to put the House on record against President Bush's decision to deploy more than 20,000 additional U.S. combat troops to Iraq. In two short paragraphs, the resolution affirms Congress's support for "the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq" before breaking with the president's new strategy. Read moreI have to say that this resolution does nothing at all, except oppose the Presidents new plan. It offers nothing such as another option, or a way for congress to do anything against the troop build up. It is disgusting that the Democrats would do what they are going to do, they are doing something that will make themselves look good in front of ignorant voters. Americans will see that they passed a resolution against the war. I believe that unless the Democrats offer a new plan for victory, not a withdrawal plan then they should not do anything. I say "not a withdrawal plan" because that is not a plan. This is not Vietnam which was an individual situation, if we pulled out of Iraq several nations would be placed in a Middle East power struggle, which would probably end in a multinational war in the Middle East.
Amhadinejad = No Fear
The Guardian discussed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads, comments and his shrugging "off the threat of the a US attack and said accusations that Tehran was arming insurgents in Iraq represented an attempt to find a scapegoat for American "defeats and failures".
U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.
I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.
U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.
I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.
Amhadinejad = No Fear
The Guardian discussed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads, comments and his shrugging "off the threat of the a US attack and said accusations that Tehran was arming insurgents in Iraq represented an attempt to find a scapegoat for American "defeats and failures".
U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.
I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.
U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.
I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.
N. Korea Stops Nuclear Armament
The N.Y. Times says:
North Korea agreed Tuesday after arduous talks to shut down its main nuclear reactor and eventually dismantle its atomic weapons program, just four months after the communist state shocked the world by testing a nuclear bomb.The deal marks the first concrete plan for disarmament in more than three years of six-nation negotiations, and could potentially herald a new era of cooperation in the region with the North's longtime foes -- the United States and Japan -- also agreeing to discuss normalizing relations with Pyongyang.
This is a step in the right direction for the world, bringing an end to nuclear weapons in North Korea shows that in some instances diplomatic talks works. I think however we will have to see how this affect U.S. Foreign policy in general.
John Bolton, former U.N. Ambassador says that this is similar to the deal that the Clinton administration tried to make in the ending days of his administration. The Chief U.S. Negotiator told CNN's American Morning, that this is different because this was not a "bilateral" agreement but an agreement between North Korea, its neighbors and the United States.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
Blog the Vote- Obama announces his bid for President
Its official early Saturday morning in front of a large crowd where President Lincoln "called on a divided house to stand together," Sen. Barack Obama announced he is running for the democratic nomination.
Obama said in his speech that "people who love their country can change it," and thats what he wants to do.
Friday, February 09, 2007
Romney concedes: War was mismanaged
The Assoiciated Press reports
What do you think?
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney conceded that the war in Iraq has been poorly managed and may hurt Republicans again next year, but he refused to oppose the course President Bush has charted.I would have to agree with Romney. The war has been mismanaged to this point however I think Romney is right not to oppose the new course because it is completely brand new. It seems to be the only viable option for "victory," the American people and members of Congress should give it an opportunity to work. If you don't we are still in a "poorly managed" war, the tables may change.
What do you think?
Blog The Vote- Gore Supporters Meet Without Gore
CNN Political Ticker says:
Some Al Gore supporters apparently aren't taking "no" for an answer.I highly doubt that Al Gore will run for President, I do not believe he has the will and drive to run for president again. If he did he would have done so again in 2004.
They're plotting to get him into the 2008 presidential race, although he's repeatedly said he's not running.
Gore's top policy adviser from his 2000 presidential bid and other key supporters met in Boston today to mull a potential Gore campaign.
They say the former vice president wasn't involved in the meeting.
Hamas and Fatah sign Peace Agreement
The rival Palestinian powers signed a peace agreement late Thursday, that would create a National Unity government controlled by Fatah and Hamas, the NY Times Reported. This could mean great things for the region, however unless they end Hamas' terrorist way they are going to get no where.
The National Unity government is not going to be successful until it recognizes the State of Israel and its right to exist. U.S. and other foreign aide will continue to be withheld until the Palestinian Authority does so. The Unity government will do very little in terms of the Israel--Palestinian Conflict.
The National Unity government is not going to be successful until it recognizes the State of Israel and its right to exist. U.S. and other foreign aide will continue to be withheld until the Palestinian Authority does so. The Unity government will do very little in terms of the Israel--Palestinian Conflict.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Pelosi's Palace in the Sky
I tend not to read the New York Post however they had an article online today which cited that the plane requested by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi costs tax payers $22,000 an hour to operate.
The U.S. Air Force say it has offered Pelosi a different plane (C-21 Executive Jet) that operates at only $900 an hour. Pelosi's predecessor Dennis Hastert used the same plane following 9/11 when additional security for the person second in line to president was needed.
Pelosi's issue with the C-21 Executive Jet is that it must refuel enroute to San Francisco, her home town. I would have to agree with Pelosi (for once), politicians need to get back to their districts as quickly and efficiently as possible. Stopping to refuel make her trip longer, members of Congress need to spend time in their districts and on the hill. They need to be able to make this almost weekly trips as easy as possible. If she took a commercial flight she would be able to fly from Washington to San Francisco in 7 hours stopping to refuel would force the trip to at least 10 hours, almost an entire business day. The time saved by the larger plane outweighs the cost, more business will be able to be conducted.
What do you think?
The U.S. Air Force say it has offered Pelosi a different plane (C-21 Executive Jet) that operates at only $900 an hour. Pelosi's predecessor Dennis Hastert used the same plane following 9/11 when additional security for the person second in line to president was needed.
Pelosi's issue with the C-21 Executive Jet is that it must refuel enroute to San Francisco, her home town. I would have to agree with Pelosi (for once), politicians need to get back to their districts as quickly and efficiently as possible. Stopping to refuel make her trip longer, members of Congress need to spend time in their districts and on the hill. They need to be able to make this almost weekly trips as easy as possible. If she took a commercial flight she would be able to fly from Washington to San Francisco in 7 hours stopping to refuel would force the trip to at least 10 hours, almost an entire business day. The time saved by the larger plane outweighs the cost, more business will be able to be conducted.
What do you think?
Insurgents Changing Tactics?
Over the past 3 weeks six helicopters have gone down in Iraq, many are speculating that Iraqi insurgents are changing to more aggressive and intelligent tactics.
American officials told the NY Time that the streak strongly suggests that insurgents have adapted their tactics and are now putting more effort into shooting down the aircraft.
This was the sixth helicopter to be shot down in the last three weeks: "The helicopter was flying and passed over us, then we heard the firing of a missile," an eyewitness told the Independent.
I think that insurgents are changing their tactics because they have run out of options and are scrambling for victory. I think that we will see a great topple of the insurgency in the coming months.
American officials told the NY Time that the streak strongly suggests that insurgents have adapted their tactics and are now putting more effort into shooting down the aircraft.
This was the sixth helicopter to be shot down in the last three weeks: "The helicopter was flying and passed over us, then we heard the firing of a missile," an eyewitness told the Independent.
I think that insurgents are changing their tactics because they have run out of options and are scrambling for victory. I think that we will see a great topple of the insurgency in the coming months.
7 Republicans Push for a Vote on Iraq War Resolution
CNN.com reports that yesterday several anti-troop surge GOP senators lead by Sen. John Warner circulated a letter to leading Democrats and Republicans, saying the "current stalemate" over the Iraq resolutions is "unacceptable" and they intend to offer the Levin-Warner resolution "disagreeing" with the increase in troops to future bills coming before the Senate.
"We strongly believe the Senate should be allowed to work its will on our resolution as well as on the concepts brought forward by other senators," Warner said on the Senate floor, reading from the letter. "Monday's procedural vote should not be interpreted as any lessening of our resolve to go forward advocating the concepts" of the resolution.
"We strongly believe the Senate should be allowed to work its will on our resolution as well as on the concepts brought forward by other senators," Warner said on the Senate floor, reading from the letter. "Monday's procedural vote should not be interpreted as any lessening of our resolve to go forward advocating the concepts" of the resolution.
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Sen. John McCain offers his own Iraq Resolution
Sen. John McCain released a resolution backed by Sen. Lieberman, Sen. Graham, Sen. Cornyn, Sen. Hutchison, Sen. Domenici, Sen. Thune, Sen. Hatch, and Sen. Roberts. The resolution creates 11 benchmarks which the Iraqi government must meet as well as supports the presidents troop build up.
"In order for us to have a solid chance of success in Iraq, both Americans and Iraqis must fulfill certain responsibilities," McCain said.
The Senate resolution calls on on Congress to provide the U.S. troops the necessary support that would allow General Petraeus to carry out the U.S. mission in Iraq.
The benchmarks built into the resolution enables the U.S. to see if the new strategy in Iraq is working. Sen. McCain told ABC's "This Week," that:
Their is no option for further defeat in Iraq, the Americans and Iraqi forces need to overcome and beat the insurgents. If not we have taken a million steps backward and we are just sitting ducks for another attack on Americans. McCain's resolution offers the check, that congress has been looking for in order to hold power over congress. Those who claim the only power congress holds now is that of the purse--are wrong. Congress cannot and will not withhold funds from the troops, the American people will not stand for it.
"In order for us to have a solid chance of success in Iraq, both Americans and Iraqis must fulfill certain responsibilities," McCain said.
The Senate resolution calls on on Congress to provide the U.S. troops the necessary support that would allow General Petraeus to carry out the U.S. mission in Iraq.
The benchmarks built into the resolution enables the U.S. to see if the new strategy in Iraq is working. Sen. McCain told ABC's "This Week," that:
the consequences are obvious. I mean, if they’re not meeting those benchmarks, then obviously the new strategy isn’t succeeding. And I can’t tell you what the other options are, because there are no good options to this. If there was a good option to what we’re doing, to sending more young Americans in harm’s way, I’d tell you. They’re all bad options, in my view, if this one isn’t supported and succeeds.He estimated that it will only take a few months for us to see success from the new strategy and determine whether the Iraqi government was assuming more responsibility and moving toward both economic and political stability.
Their is no option for further defeat in Iraq, the Americans and Iraqi forces need to overcome and beat the insurgents. If not we have taken a million steps backward and we are just sitting ducks for another attack on Americans. McCain's resolution offers the check, that congress has been looking for in order to hold power over congress. Those who claim the only power congress holds now is that of the purse--are wrong. Congress cannot and will not withhold funds from the troops, the American people will not stand for it.
Power Struggle in the Middle East
The Middle East is on the brink of all out Civil War, said Syrian President Bashar Assad. In Lebanon Hizbullah is gearing up to fight the democratic government, in the Palestinian territories if scheduled peace talks fail Hamas and Fatah are ready to go to war. Someone will gain from these conflict the Saudi's fear that Iran may act on these conflicts to grasp hold of power in the region.
"With the prospect of three civil wars looming over the Middle East — and Iran poised to gain from them all — Saudi Arabia has abandoned its behind-the-scenes checkbook diplomacy and taken on a central, aggressive role in reshaping the region’s conflicts," said the New York Times. If the Saudis are unable to take control of the region, Syrian President Bashar Assad is ready to do so.
The Syrian leader told ABC News that he is ready to sit and talk with the United States although he lacks confidence in such talks. He does not think that Washington will consider meeting although it could be the "last chance" to avoid civil war. Assad feels that the Presidents administration does not have the will or "vision" for peace in Iraq and the region. He pointed out, that the President father had the "will to achieve the peace in the region."
Assad said Syria could play an important role in "supporting the dialogue between the different parties inside Iraq with the support from the other parties like the Americans and the other neighboring countries..."
"With the prospect of three civil wars looming over the Middle East — and Iran poised to gain from them all — Saudi Arabia has abandoned its behind-the-scenes checkbook diplomacy and taken on a central, aggressive role in reshaping the region’s conflicts," said the New York Times. If the Saudis are unable to take control of the region, Syrian President Bashar Assad is ready to do so.
The Syrian leader told ABC News that he is ready to sit and talk with the United States although he lacks confidence in such talks. He does not think that Washington will consider meeting although it could be the "last chance" to avoid civil war. Assad feels that the Presidents administration does not have the will or "vision" for peace in Iraq and the region. He pointed out, that the President father had the "will to achieve the peace in the region."
Assad said Syria could play an important role in "supporting the dialogue between the different parties inside Iraq with the support from the other parties like the Americans and the other neighboring countries..."
The region is a powder keg ready to explode at a moments notice. The countries heading towards civil war really need to resolve their conflicts before the race for power grows to--imperialism, which is what will happen. As these countries begin to engage in Civil War, we will begin to see the Iranians, the Saudis, and the Syrians taking an active role in these areas and one force will over take the rest. We could experience another power like the U.S.S.R. The one I am describing, a superpower controlled by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is far more dangerous than U.S.S.R. ever was.
What do you think?
Blog The Vote- Giulliani says he can win.
Monday, former New York City mayor and republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giulliani filed the necessary paper work to announce his bid for President in 2008.
Rudy told Fox News' Hannity and Colmes that he is in to win and that all the candidates are good people. He also offered his perspective on the war on Terror. He said that the "war on terror" is a war we must win and we must consider the other forces in the region.
Giulliani cited that we must put pressure on Iran and that we are facing the same dilemma we faced during the cold war. Nuclear arms cannot be in the hands of an irrational person.
Rudy maybe the moderate that many Americans are looking for.
What do you think?
Rudy told Fox News' Hannity and Colmes that he is in to win and that all the candidates are good people. He also offered his perspective on the war on Terror. He said that the "war on terror" is a war we must win and we must consider the other forces in the region.
Giulliani cited that we must put pressure on Iran and that we are facing the same dilemma we faced during the cold war. Nuclear arms cannot be in the hands of an irrational person.
Rudy maybe the moderate that many Americans are looking for.
What do you think?
Monday, February 05, 2007
Republicans Block Troop Build-up resolution
The Republican minority was successful today in blocking a Senate resolution against the surge in troops.
"We must heed the results of the November elections and the wishes of the American people," told Majority Leader Harry Reid to ABC News.
The vote was 49-47, 60 short of the required majority to pass a resolution. This is can be deemed both a success and failure for America. It continues to illustrate the great divide in American society about the war and the surge in troops. I think it is really important for the Senate to support the troops, the resolution in my opinion is doing the opposite.
"We must heed the results of the November elections and the wishes of the American people," told Majority Leader Harry Reid to ABC News.
The vote was 49-47, 60 short of the required majority to pass a resolution. This is can be deemed both a success and failure for America. It continues to illustrate the great divide in American society about the war and the surge in troops. I think it is really important for the Senate to support the troops, the resolution in my opinion is doing the opposite.
Republicans block the anti-War resolution
Senate Republican leaders Friday threatened to block the Senate from taking up a bill that would put the chamber on record disagreeing with President Bush's troop increase in Iraq unless Democrats agree to allow Republicans to offer alternatives to the measure, reports CNN.com
The possibility of a filibuster does not surprise me. This is a long needed debate on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Congress can pass any resolution for or against the war and it would be fine with me if and only if members backing the anti-war resolution offered their own plan for success. If you cannot offer an alternative then you should support the only plan currently on the table.
The African American Vote=Key to Democrats Nomination
The Politico Reports: A key supporter of Illinois Sen. Barack Obama urged united African-American support for his presidential bid, questioning whether black Democrats still "owe" Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton their support, according to several people who attended a meeting of black Democratic politicians.
The comments by Illinois Senate President Emil Jones Jr., which he confirmed Saturday, angered Clinton backers and deepened a sharp rift among African-American political activists.
This is exactly what Republicans would want if Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama split the African-American vote it will be difficult for them to get through the primary. The Democrats will nominate a less then qualified candidate, more likely a candidate that can't win on the national stage. The only Democrats capable of competing in a national election are Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton. The former is the strongest, Obama in my opinion is riding a wave of stardom that will not likely last through a Presidential election.
The Baghdad Operational Command
Col. Douglass Heckman, the senior adviser to the 9th Iraqi Army Division told CNN "Officially the Baghdad Operational Command takes over tomorrow, so the expectation is that the plan will be implemented soon thereafter, very soon thereafter."
Although U.S. source have said the plan will gradually go into effect, big changes on the ground are expected to occur throughout Monday. The pressure on insurgents will increase as the days go on forcing the insurgent to submission
Thousands of U.S. and Iraqi reinforcements already were in place for the neighborhood-by-neighborhood sweep to clamp off the violence by Sunni insurgents and Shiite militia.
What do you think?
Although U.S. source have said the plan will gradually go into effect, big changes on the ground are expected to occur throughout Monday. The pressure on insurgents will increase as the days go on forcing the insurgent to submission
Thousands of U.S. and Iraqi reinforcements already were in place for the neighborhood-by-neighborhood sweep to clamp off the violence by Sunni insurgents and Shiite militia.
He declined to give precise numbers, although U.S. President George W. Bush has ordered 21,500 additional troops to Iraq by the end of May.
I think we will see great changes in Iraq by the end of May. As the surge in troops grow and the new strategy on the ground goes into effect the American people will see what we have been waiting for success in Iraq.What do you think?
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb?
That is the question being tested in California. Legislators have taken a step towards placing a ban on your average 50 cent incandescent light bulb in the effort to save our environment. What would replace them are CFLs. Those are those spiral bulbs which look cool, but also carry the price tag (about $7). In the long run, they work longer and save money on your electric bill.
On average 2-billion lightbulbs are sold of which only 5 percent (100 million) are CFLs. The "How Many Legislatures Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act" would permanently place a ban on incandescent bulbs by 2012. Maybe other states may follow, as global warming becomes more and more of a political concern.
On average 2-billion lightbulbs are sold of which only 5 percent (100 million) are CFLs. The "How Many Legislatures Does it Take to Change a Lightbulb Act" would permanently place a ban on incandescent bulbs by 2012. Maybe other states may follow, as global warming becomes more and more of a political concern.
Setting a date for Withdrawal
Senator and Presidential candidate Barrack Obama has suggested legislation that would withdraw American forces from Iraq by March, 2008. The date falls within the parameters offered by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which recommended the removal of combat troops by the first quarter of next year. The Washington Post reports:
"The days of our open-ended commitment must come to a close," Obama said in his speech. "It is time for us to fundamentally change our policy. It is time to give Iraqis their country back."
I agree that our open ended agreement must end, however this is being viewed as a way for Obama to increase the level of his foreign policy work before the 2008 Presidential election. As well, it is to early to tell when the troops will come home, if President Bush's new strategy continues to work they maybe home earlier. I continue to believe that American forces will be in Iraq for eternity, like Korea.
Posting
I will start to post around 11 a.m. their maybe an article or 2 posted earlier but full blogging will start around 11 a.m.
--Reuben
--Reuben
"You First"
I love political cartoons and this one is amazing. It is so accurate all the politicians in Washington, D.C. can talk about pulling funding from the war but NO one will do it. It would be political suicide for anyone politician or political party to pull funding. The American people will see it as if they are pulling the funds from the troops and putting our troops in an unprecedented harmful situation. (Cartoon: Cox & Forkum)Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Congress Finding Themselves Powerless
As President Bush deloys more troops to Iraq, Congress finds themselves useless against his Iraqi War decisions. Bush has previously declared himself "the decision maker" which has even led Senate Republicans to rebel. Even though Congress does hold power of purse, cutting of funding to the troops can potentially be political peril. The Senate will hold hearings this week to find alternative ways to stop what they believe not to be in the interest of the nation. Possibilities can include putting forth a resolution to stop funding troops deployed from a certain date, or even calling back troops to leave a minimal amount to continue to train and patrol Iraq. Then again Congress realizes that veto power remains in the hands of the President and overriding the veto would be very difficult.
"Congress used its war powers to cut off or put conditions on funding for the Vietnam war and conflicts in Cambodia, Somalia and Bosnia" (Yahoo! News). They can certainly do it again.
"Congress used its war powers to cut off or put conditions on funding for the Vietnam war and conflicts in Cambodia, Somalia and Bosnia" (Yahoo! News). They can certainly do it again.
Blog the Vote - Edward's is Livin' Large
Senator John Edwards, the potential Presidential Candidate who is running to appeal to poorest people in America, announced his 2008 bid at the very symbolic background of the ninth ward in New Orleans. He certainly could have done it from his home which sits on 100 acres of land just outside of Chapel Hill. As Jay Leno puts it, Edwards can fit "both Americas" in his multi-million dollar, 28,000 square feet home.
Edwards has been criticized by a fellow Democrat who said, "its one thing to be a millionaire, it's totally deaf tone to be using Katrina victims while putting finishing touches on your multi-million dollar mansion." Edwards response, "If you're in public life, people will be critical of you because of the way you walk, because of what you eat, because of the way you talk, like this Southern accent I've got. You know, you can't worry about stuff like that," he told CBS News. Or should you worry?
(Picture: Example only, not his actual mansion)
Baker will testify
James A. Baker III, the co-chairman of the Iraq Study Group, has ended weeks of resistance and today will testify before Congress on the war, avoiding a split with his fellow co-chairman, former Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-Ind.).
Sources familiar with the efforts to persuade Baker to testify said he did not want to appear to be lobbying against President Bush at the height of his push for 21,500 additional troops in Iraq.
This testimony will not be that interesting because we no what Baker is going to say it will be based on the Iraq Study Group report. The Senate committee is just waisting their time, Baker and his commission are against the surge in troops.
President Bush Iraqi forces "are beginning to show me something"
President Bush was heard yesterday on National Public Radio stressing his new strategy in Iraq is working already. He said that Iraqi forces "are beginning to show me something"
"This fight is an indication of what is taking place, and that is the Iraqis are beginning to take the lead," Bush said. "So my first reaction on this report from the battlefield is that the Iraqis are beginning to show me something."
The initiative taken by Iraqi forces this weekend indicates a transfer of power has begun. Iraqi forces were on the front lines of this battle and American forces only played a supportive role in the battle.
"This fight is an indication of what is taking place, and that is the Iraqis are beginning to take the lead," Bush said. "So my first reaction on this report from the battlefield is that the Iraqis are beginning to show me something."
The initiative taken by Iraqi forces this weekend indicates a transfer of power has begun. Iraqi forces were on the front lines of this battle and American forces only played a supportive role in the battle.
Monday, January 29, 2007
The Black Vote - Part II
While watching an episode of Affirmative Reaction on MTV, one of the questions to the "white" contestants was, "Name 5 prominent black leaders." Well off the top of your head one can think of MLK, Malcolm X, Opera, to name a few. But one of the answers that none of the contestants were able to get was Bill Clinton. Last time many of us checked Bill Clinton was a white man - not exactly. Bill Clinton has been labeled the "first Black President" by many in the black community. Now the concern becomes will the support of the this huge constituency transfer over to wifey Hillary or to the man of the season Barack Obama.
Obama who has been labeled "white" by many in the black community, says once people know what he's truely about, he will indefinately get the black vote. Most people see his ivy league education, his white mother, and find other "white" associations to label Obama. Many overlook his commitment to civil rights, and his mission to reduce the disparity between the rich and the poor.
Who'll get the black vote?
Obama who has been labeled "white" by many in the black community, says once people know what he's truely about, he will indefinately get the black vote. Most people see his ivy league education, his white mother, and find other "white" associations to label Obama. Many overlook his commitment to civil rights, and his mission to reduce the disparity between the rich and the poor.
Who'll get the black vote?
Blog The Vote-Another person to add to the long list of Republican "candidates"
The Associated Press Reports:
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, a Southern Baptist minister, is setting up an exploratory committee to gauge his prospects for the Republican nomination.
He's expected in Iowa tomorrow and Wednesday.Huckabee, who left office earlier this month, faces steep odds in a crowded G-O-P field that includes well-known and well-funded hopefuls such as Senator John McCain of Arizona, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
Huckabee is a staunch opponent of abortion rights and gay marriage.
"We have made significant progress"
Vice President Dick Cheney says that America has "made significant progress" in Iraq.
Over the weekend Iraqi forces backed by U.S. military tanks and helicopters, had a day-long battle against insurgents. The Iraqi government estimates betweeen 250-300 insurgents were killed in the battle which took place near the city Najaf.
Iraqi security forces maintain primary control of Najaf province, and U.S. forces do not have an established, full-time presence there. U.S. military units based in Baghdad responded to Najaf when the fighting escalated.
Over the weekend Iraqi forces backed by U.S. military tanks and helicopters, had a day-long battle against insurgents. The Iraqi government estimates betweeen 250-300 insurgents were killed in the battle which took place near the city Najaf.
Iraqi security forces maintain primary control of Najaf province, and U.S. forces do not have an established, full-time presence there. U.S. military units based in Baghdad responded to Najaf when the fighting escalated.
"They saw that they needed some help and called in air support," a U.S. military official told the Washington Post on condition of anonymity. "That's exactly what they're supposed to do."
Can this be considered success in Iraq? Does this mean the Presidents new counter insurgency strategy will work? or is this not enough to change people's opinion? What do you think?Friday, January 26, 2007
Democrats are in Iraq for the weekend.
Speaker of House Nancy Pelosi and several of her Democratic peers are in Iraq this weekend on a fact-finding mission. In which Pelosi says find a "greater understanding of the others' point of view," and "to convey to our troops the appreciation of the American people for what they're doing, to applaud their patriotism."The Pelosi delegation visited the heavily fortified Green Zone, site of the American Embassy, and met with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Pelosi has been a sharp critic of the Bush administration's conduct of the war and has led a drive in Congress against sending 21,500 more troops as part of a new security crackdown in Baghdad.
This come as several different resolutions are ciculating on Capitol Hill. My take is that the delegation is trying to show that they do support our troops but they do not support the President new strategy. As well they are gaining an education of the true situation in Iraq by being at the source, the Prime Minister has probably spoken to the delegation of how important the American presence in Iraq is and what the Iraqi government is doing at their end of the strategy. Even with the circulating resolutions their will be no change in policy, nor will a piece of legislation with holding funds from the military ever pass.
Pelosi has been a sharp critic of the Bush administration's conduct of the war and has led a drive in Congress against sending 21,500 more troops as part of a new security crackdown in Baghdad.
This come as several different resolutions are ciculating on Capitol Hill. My take is that the delegation is trying to show that they do support our troops but they do not support the President new strategy. As well they are gaining an education of the true situation in Iraq by being at the source, the Prime Minister has probably spoken to the delegation of how important the American presence in Iraq is and what the Iraqi government is doing at their end of the strategy. Even with the circulating resolutions their will be no change in policy, nor will a piece of legislation with holding funds from the military ever pass.
Informed Students News
We are ranked 36 out of 124 according to TopBlogger.com. Keep on reading Informed Students. Thank you for your continued support.
--Reuben
--Reuben
New person to lead the troops in Iraq.
Breaking News: The Senate has unanimously confirmed Army Lt.Gen. David Petraeus to become top U.S. commander in Iraq. Authorized To Kill
The Washington Post reports that American forces in Iraq now have the power to capture or kill Iranian operatives inside Iraq as part of an aggressive new strategy to weaken Tehran's influence across the Middle East and compel it to give up its nuclear program, according to government and counterterrorism officials with direct knowledge of the effort.
The question is why has it taken this long. The reason we have been losing the war is because of rules like this, originally Iranians captured would only be held for 3 to 4 day then released, in order to keep Iran from expanding its influence in the region (that has worked marvelously). In this war, with the terrorist embedded into the Iraqi world, forces should be able to do whatever it takes to capture terrorist or insurgents. Thats why we will see results from President Bush's new strategy in Iraq because the troops can actually do something. It is ridiculous to send troops into a country and not allow them to do their job, because the Iraqi government has agreements with parts of the terrorist. No, if your intent is to kill Americans then American forces have the right to kill or capture you (in a humane way of course)
The question is why has it taken this long. The reason we have been losing the war is because of rules like this, originally Iranians captured would only be held for 3 to 4 day then released, in order to keep Iran from expanding its influence in the region (that has worked marvelously). In this war, with the terrorist embedded into the Iraqi world, forces should be able to do whatever it takes to capture terrorist or insurgents. Thats why we will see results from President Bush's new strategy in Iraq because the troops can actually do something. It is ridiculous to send troops into a country and not allow them to do their job, because the Iraqi government has agreements with parts of the terrorist. No, if your intent is to kill Americans then American forces have the right to kill or capture you (in a humane way of course)
Democrats Plan=Cut Funding
Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) "has scheduled a hearing next Tuesday in his Judiciary Committee subcommittee to explorewhether Congress has the authority to cut off funding for the U.S. military campaign in Iraq," The Politico reports. Feingold said Thursday "I will soon be introducing legislation to use the power of the purse to end what is clearly one of the greatest mistake in the historu of the nation's foreign policy."
It would be political suicide for the Democratic party, if even a piece of legislation was brought fourth in the Senate to stop funding the war in Iraq. A resolution in opposition of the Presidents new strategy and asking for "benchmarks" are great ideas, however cutting funds would be leaving our troops to die. To "use the power of the purse" to end the war would bring fourth thousands of American deaths and an angered armed forces. Cutting funds would show congresses lack of support for the troops themselves. It would be the end of the Democratic parties hopes for any chance in 2008 and any chance in the next 20 years (atleast) of political success.
It would be political suicide for the Democratic party, if even a piece of legislation was brought fourth in the Senate to stop funding the war in Iraq. A resolution in opposition of the Presidents new strategy and asking for "benchmarks" are great ideas, however cutting funds would be leaving our troops to die. To "use the power of the purse" to end the war would bring fourth thousands of American deaths and an angered armed forces. Cutting funds would show congresses lack of support for the troops themselves. It would be the end of the Democratic parties hopes for any chance in 2008 and any chance in the next 20 years (atleast) of political success.
| |
Senate Iraq Resolution
The Senate foreign relations committee took a shot at the president Wednesday, voting 12-9 for a non-binding resolution against the troop surge. Nebraska Republican Chuck Hagel was the only senator to stray from his party. The Republicans are trying to create their own resolution, reports the Washington Post. Senate Republican asked for "benchmarks to measure progress in Iraq and possibly a new diplomatic effort to end the war."
The troop increase is clearly the only way to resolve the conflict in Iraq, we need to put more troops in order to restore law and order. Until that happens the Iraqi government is powerless. These resolutions should only be asking for benchmarks, any words against troops will only hurt the United States more. I understand that many Americans no longer support the war but we all need to support our troops.
What do you think?
The troop increase is clearly the only way to resolve the conflict in Iraq, we need to put more troops in order to restore law and order. Until that happens the Iraqi government is powerless. These resolutions should only be asking for benchmarks, any words against troops will only hurt the United States more. I understand that many Americans no longer support the war but we all need to support our troops.
What do you think?
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Pelosi's Upset
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that President George W. Bush did not consult her before announcing his new strategy for the war in Iraq -- a sign that, despite the cozy rhetoric, the relationship between Washington's two powerhouses has already had its share of friction. Her interview according to the Politico continued on to say that the Democrats will now take hold of domestic policy, leaving Pelosi as the top dog.
Pelosi said she thinks that if the President gathers enough Republican support for his immigration and energy proposal, we will see legislative progress. However we will not see anything in regard of President Bush's tax cuts for Health Insurance plan.
I think that Pelosi is right when she was angered that the President did not consult her on the new Iraqi strategy, although he does not have to. She is the third in line to the Presidency and therefore deserve some respect. Although Pelosi was thankful for the Presidents salute to her at the beginning of his address, I think that it is all political "fluff." He is really trying to appease the Democrats rather than compromise with them, appeasing the Democratic party will just not work.
What do you think?
Pelosi said she thinks that if the President gathers enough Republican support for his immigration and energy proposal, we will see legislative progress. However we will not see anything in regard of President Bush's tax cuts for Health Insurance plan.
I think that Pelosi is right when she was angered that the President did not consult her on the new Iraqi strategy, although he does not have to. She is the third in line to the Presidency and therefore deserve some respect. Although Pelosi was thankful for the Presidents salute to her at the beginning of his address, I think that it is all political "fluff." He is really trying to appease the Democrats rather than compromise with them, appeasing the Democratic party will just not work.
What do you think?
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
What's up with the Minimum Wage bill?
After being passed in the House, the Senate has voted the Minimum wage increase bill down. This does not mean they do not support an increase, rather simply not the way the House wants it done. In fact the Senate is taking President Bush's suggestions of including a tax breaks for small businesses into consideration.
Today the Senate voted on a version of the bill which allows for states to set their own minimum wages. That too had been voted down. As you may have realized New York's minimum wage is higher than the national rate of $5.15. The national rate simply sets a bare minimum standard, but most "blue" states where the cost of living is higher the minimum wage is as well. Hence even if the minimum wage was set to $7.20 (which is what Congress currently wants) it would not affect some states at all whose wages already pay such an amount.
To battle that concern a Senator has proposed raising $2.20 from the current minimum of every individual states.
We'll have to wait and see where this goes, but you can bet something will definitely happen by the end of this fiscal year.
Today the Senate voted on a version of the bill which allows for states to set their own minimum wages. That too had been voted down. As you may have realized New York's minimum wage is higher than the national rate of $5.15. The national rate simply sets a bare minimum standard, but most "blue" states where the cost of living is higher the minimum wage is as well. Hence even if the minimum wage was set to $7.20 (which is what Congress currently wants) it would not affect some states at all whose wages already pay such an amount.
To battle that concern a Senator has proposed raising $2.20 from the current minimum of every individual states.
We'll have to wait and see where this goes, but you can bet something will definitely happen by the end of this fiscal year.
John Kerry Will Not Enter the 2008 Presidential Race
The long awaited announcement has finally come and former Presidential candidate will not enter the race for 2008. A spokesmen for John Kerry announced that he intends to run for another term as Massachusetts state senator. Kerry plans to disclose his political plans in remarks on the Senate floor later in the day, according to this official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid pre-empting a formal announcement.
Reaction to the State of the Union
Former New York City Mayor and 2008 Presidential Contender Rudy Giulliani appeared on NBC's Today Show saying that he wants the U.S. to succeed in Iraq because it's important to the overall war on terror. According to Giuliani, failure means "a big defeat against terrorists."
Illinois state Senator Barack Obama says a phased redeployment of U-S troops would work just as well. The Democratic Presidential Contender says keeping American troops in the region would send a message that the U-S still wants to help the Iraqi government while telling other countries such as Iran that "we're not abandoning the field."
Illinois state Senator Barack Obama says a phased redeployment of U-S troops would work just as well. The Democratic Presidential Contender says keeping American troops in the region would send a message that the U-S still wants to help the Iraqi government while telling other countries such as Iran that "we're not abandoning the field."
U.S. Stikes in Somalia
The WashingtonPost.com Reports:
A U.S. Air Force AC-130 gunship staged an airstrike against suspected al-Qaeda operatives in southern Somalia on Monday, the second such attack this month, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
There was no immediate information on specific targets or the strike's results. The United States has said that at least three senior al-Qaeda operatives were being sheltered by the Islamic Courts movement that was ousted from power in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, by the Ethiopian military last month.
 |
Word of the new attack came the same day as a long line of Ethiopian artillery, armored vehicles and trucks loaded with soldiers rolled toward the edges of Mogadishu, beginning a withdrawal from a fragile capital that many residents fear will now slip further into chaos.
If it is true that these missions have been successful, we are not going to see much of anything new. The media is completely centered on the Iraq issue and that doesn't look to be changing. Although it is appearing on the Front Page of the Daily Nation, I doubt we will see much of a shift in public opinion. President Bush will use this to his advantage in order to promote "success" in the War on Terror. The question remains what really is success in the dwindling War on Terror?
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
State of the Union 2007 Final Update
To read the full transcript of the President speech click here.
Its been along night of blogging about the speech, I hope that I have been able to provide some insight for you on the speech. I continue to encourage your comments and discussion.
--Reuben
Its been along night of blogging about the speech, I hope that I have been able to provide some insight for you on the speech. I continue to encourage your comments and discussion.
--Reuben
My thoughts on the State of the Union
Tonight's State of the Union address had few surprises to me. Personally I think a lot of his proposal cheaper health care, immigration reform, et cetera are things he has been trying to accomplish for a few years. I do not see this speech changing his popularity level or changing much of the policy over the next 2 years, he really is a lame duck.
Let me discuss Iraq. In a post-speech interview with Anderson Cooper, Senator Kit Bond (R-Missouri) said "the President has given us a new direction." Which is completely true it is important to realize that his new policy is more than a surge in troops but a brand new strategy. The strategy holds Prime Minister Nuri al-Malaki and the Iraqi government to a new level and saying that they must act. I feel that the legislation coming out of Congress is not helping bring an end to the War in Iraq. The Democrats continue not to offer another strategy. I agree with the President that we must "give the strategy a chance" to work. The new strategy forces Iraqi's take on al-Sadar's army and take political control. I agree that this policy is our best chance for success. The Presidents statement that we are no longer in the war that we entered is completely true but it is not a war which we can leave unfinished.
I feel that the Presidents speech was an out stretched arm to Democrats and opposing Republicans to work together over the next 2 years on the domestic and foreign agendas. An early CNN poll says that 41% of Americans see the speech as "very positive." I agree that it was positive and that we will see some changes in partisanship.
What do you think?
Let me discuss Iraq. In a post-speech interview with Anderson Cooper, Senator Kit Bond (R-Missouri) said "the President has given us a new direction." Which is completely true it is important to realize that his new policy is more than a surge in troops but a brand new strategy. The strategy holds Prime Minister Nuri al-Malaki and the Iraqi government to a new level and saying that they must act. I feel that the legislation coming out of Congress is not helping bring an end to the War in Iraq. The Democrats continue not to offer another strategy. I agree with the President that we must "give the strategy a chance" to work. The new strategy forces Iraqi's take on al-Sadar's army and take political control. I agree that this policy is our best chance for success. The Presidents statement that we are no longer in the war that we entered is completely true but it is not a war which we can leave unfinished.
I feel that the Presidents speech was an out stretched arm to Democrats and opposing Republicans to work together over the next 2 years on the domestic and foreign agendas. An early CNN poll says that 41% of Americans see the speech as "very positive." I agree that it was positive and that we will see some changes in partisanship.
What do you think?
State of the Union 2007 Summary
After 8 pages of notes, the Presidents speech was just under 50 minutes. Prior to the start the President was asked "ready to go?" by Nancy Pelosi his response "let's do this."
He opened the speech with an anecdote reference to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's father and said it his "distinct honor to be the first President to say Madame Speaker" and he expressed his congratulations to her and new "the Democratic majority." He continued by saying "we are all held to the same standards," and that bipartisanship is clearly important.
The meat and potatoes of the speech concentrated half on domestic policy and half on the War on Terror, his foreign policy. In his Domestic agenda the President neglected to mention the situation in the Gulf Coast.
He stressed the growing economy in America. Saying inflation and unemployment are down, while wages are up. He wants Congress to keep the economy growing and set his economic priorities. His economic goals are to balance the federal budget without raising taxes. He asked Congress to cut the deficit in half 3 years prior to the current goal of 2009. He also touched upon the issue of earmarks which are added to bills "when not even CSPAN is watching." The President ask to expose them and cut them in half by the end of this session of Congress. Lastly he asked Congress to fix Medicare and Medicaid and finally save Social Security.
He touch on the "No Child Left Behind Act," and asked Congress to reauthorize the law. He also discussed the need for more affordable and available health care.
He then discussed immigration and said we must "resolve the status of illegal immigrant with out animosity or amnesty." He conceded to establish a temporary worker program, which allow immigrants to come and work in the United State as well would allow the newly expanded Border Patrol to chase down criminals, drug smugglers, and terrorist.
Before he touched on the War on Terror, he discussed the U.S. Energy Policy. He asked to reduce Americas use of oil by 20% over the next 10 years. As well said that it would cut Middle Eastern fuel imports by 3/4. He closed by asking for Congress to double the capacity of the strategic petroleum reserve.
"To win the war on terror, we must take the fight to the enemy." He said that every time we overturn a terrorist plot "is a reminder of how hard working the enemy is." The strategy has changed in Iraq and our troops are no longer barred from doing their job but have the "orders to find the terrorist and clear them out," with no resistance from the Iraqi government. It is time for the Iraqi government to act and they know our commitment is not open ended. The government of Iraq must help Iraqi's return to their normal daily lives.
He defended his strategy by saying "it provides the best chance for success" and asked Congress and the American people "to give this strategy a chance to work." Bush also conceded that "this is not the fight we entered, but it is the fight we are in."
He closed the section on the War on Terror by saying "Nothing is more important than to succeed in the Middle East and to succeed in Iraq."
His speech touched on the United Nations sanction on Iran, and said the world cannot allow the government in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. He also discussed in little detail the nuclear problem in Korea. The President said that America continues to "awaken the world, to save the people in Darfur." He asked Congress to continue the fight on HIV/AIDs, especiall on the continent of Africa.
He opened the speech with an anecdote reference to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's father and said it his "distinct honor to be the first President to say Madame Speaker" and he expressed his congratulations to her and new "the Democratic majority." He continued by saying "we are all held to the same standards," and that bipartisanship is clearly important.
The meat and potatoes of the speech concentrated half on domestic policy and half on the War on Terror, his foreign policy. In his Domestic agenda the President neglected to mention the situation in the Gulf Coast.
He stressed the growing economy in America. Saying inflation and unemployment are down, while wages are up. He wants Congress to keep the economy growing and set his economic priorities. His economic goals are to balance the federal budget without raising taxes. He asked Congress to cut the deficit in half 3 years prior to the current goal of 2009. He also touched upon the issue of earmarks which are added to bills "when not even CSPAN is watching." The President ask to expose them and cut them in half by the end of this session of Congress. Lastly he asked Congress to fix Medicare and Medicaid and finally save Social Security.
He touch on the "No Child Left Behind Act," and asked Congress to reauthorize the law. He also discussed the need for more affordable and available health care.
He then discussed immigration and said we must "resolve the status of illegal immigrant with out animosity or amnesty." He conceded to establish a temporary worker program, which allow immigrants to come and work in the United State as well would allow the newly expanded Border Patrol to chase down criminals, drug smugglers, and terrorist.
Before he touched on the War on Terror, he discussed the U.S. Energy Policy. He asked to reduce Americas use of oil by 20% over the next 10 years. As well said that it would cut Middle Eastern fuel imports by 3/4. He closed by asking for Congress to double the capacity of the strategic petroleum reserve.
"To win the war on terror, we must take the fight to the enemy." He said that every time we overturn a terrorist plot "is a reminder of how hard working the enemy is." The strategy has changed in Iraq and our troops are no longer barred from doing their job but have the "orders to find the terrorist and clear them out," with no resistance from the Iraqi government. It is time for the Iraqi government to act and they know our commitment is not open ended. The government of Iraq must help Iraqi's return to their normal daily lives.
He defended his strategy by saying "it provides the best chance for success" and asked Congress and the American people "to give this strategy a chance to work." Bush also conceded that "this is not the fight we entered, but it is the fight we are in."
He closed the section on the War on Terror by saying "Nothing is more important than to succeed in the Middle East and to succeed in Iraq."
His speech touched on the United Nations sanction on Iran, and said the world cannot allow the government in Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons. He also discussed in little detail the nuclear problem in Korea. The President said that America continues to "awaken the world, to save the people in Darfur." He asked Congress to continue the fight on HIV/AIDs, especiall on the continent of Africa.
The speech ended with:
"The State of our union is strong, our cause is strong and,
tonight our cause goes on"
State of the Union 2007 Update
State of the Union 2007 Update Excerpts from the Presidents speech can be found here.
Who is sitting next to the First Lady? Find out here
Who's not sitting in Congress tonight?
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will skip President Bush's State of the Union address Tuesday, as a precaution to ensure continuity of the federal government in the event of a national catastrophe.
Gonzales, who is seventh in line of presidential succession, was chosen by White House officials to be protected at an undisclosed location. In addition, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, chose Rep. George Miller, D-California, to remain at an undisclosed location during the speech and House Republicans tapped Rep. John Carter of Texas to do the same.
State of the Union 2007
In a little over an hour President George W. Bush will walk into House of Representatives chambers to address the nation. His speech the White House says:The President will unveil a positive, comprehensive agenda that will improve the daily lives of the American people and explain how our actions in the world will make our Nation safer and more secure. The President believes we can find practical ways to advance the American Dream and keep our Nation safe without either party compromising its principles.Currently the President has the lowest approval rating (37% approve of the President) any President has had on the eve of the State of the Union. A full report will follow the Presidents speech. For now click here to see the 2007 State of the Union Facts Sheet and other documents concerning the speech. Be sure to watch the speech tonight at 9 PM.
BLog The Vote- Kerry Can Wait...Not
Kerr "Can afford to take his time" aides say. With the 2008 Democratic presidential field taking shape fast, Senator John F. Kerry still hasn't decided whether to join the race, and maintains that the early announcements from other candidates won't push him to act in haste, according to Kerry aides and associates. Kerry has indicated that he will announce his intentions by the end of January, in keeping with his publicly stated intention to do so "shortly after the turn of the year." His aides have drafted a "John Kerry for President '08" financial plan that will restart his fund-raising efforts with a series of house parties organized by activists around the country -- if he decides to pursue the presidency again. With $13 million still in his campaign account and wide name recognition stemming from his failed 2004 run, Kerry advisers feel that the senator can afford to take his time, unlike some other Democrats already in the race.
I feel that Kerry chances are null, he has no shot at winning the nomination. He was not one of the big campaigners for 2006 and that shows he is a washed up Democrat with little clout. The only remaining person from 2004 is John Edwards because he took a step out of spotlight following the election and has come back looking like a Presidential candidate. Kerry on the other hand, should probably go to his home and write a book or do something worthwhile.
What do you think?
I feel that Kerry chances are null, he has no shot at winning the nomination. He was not one of the big campaigners for 2006 and that shows he is a washed up Democrat with little clout. The only remaining person from 2004 is John Edwards because he took a step out of spotlight following the election and has come back looking like a Presidential candidate. Kerry on the other hand, should probably go to his home and write a book or do something worthwhile.
What do you think?
Blog The Vote- HILLARY WILL MAKE OBAMA "FIGHT FOR EVERY BLACK ENDORSEMENT AND EVERY BLACK VOTE"
Far from conceding African-American support to the most credible candidate ever of African descent, Sen. Barack Obama, the Clintons are pushing aggressively for the help of their longtime allies in the black business, political and entertainment elite. [Hillary] Clinton's supporters say she intends to make the Illinois senator fight for every black endorsement and every black vote. It's a strategy that pushes Obama to decide just how black he can afford to be: Will he pitch himself to African-American voters as the black candidate, or hew to the post-racial line that's helped make him sensationally popular with white Democrats? "He's not built to be the black candidate," said a Clinton adviser.
"Mr. President go back and look at all the options"
Senator John W. Warner of Virginia, one of Congress's leadingauthorities on the military, presented a bipartisan proposal on Monday that soundly rejected President Bush's plan to send more American troops to Baghdad and urged the administration to find a new course in Iraq."Mr. President," Mr. Warner declared, "go back and look at all the options."
I believe the President has looked at every strategic option America has in Iraq. I feel that for the first time he himself and his aides have done a very thorough study on what changes need to be made. Many Congressmen continue to bad mouth the Presidents new plan but have yet to offer their own strategy and not a strategy for complete withdrawal. I think Congress is being very vocal because they want to gain the support of the people, they, in particular the Democrats are very interested in consolidating the power. I feel that we will soon see the end to bipartisan resolutions and the start of a war on Republicans.
What do you think?
I believe the President has looked at every strategic option America has in Iraq. I feel that for the first time he himself and his aides have done a very thorough study on what changes need to be made. Many Congressmen continue to bad mouth the Presidents new plan but have yet to offer their own strategy and not a strategy for complete withdrawal. I think Congress is being very vocal because they want to gain the support of the people, they, in particular the Democrats are very interested in consolidating the power. I feel that we will soon see the end to bipartisan resolutions and the start of a war on Republicans.
What do you think?
State of the Union Buzz Words
Tonights State of the Union will provide the President a chance to gain support not only from the people but from congress. Many of his own party brethren have turned their back on him since his Iraq strategy shift.
Here's a list of a few of the President Buzz Words, that will appear tonight several times.
Here's a list of a few of the President Buzz Words, that will appear tonight several times.
"Terrorists"
"Iraq"
"Freedom"
"Economy"
"Insurgents"
"Iraq"
"Freedom"
"Economy"
"Insurgents"
State of the Union Address
Be Sure to watch the Presidents State of the Union address tonight. CNN has a Special edition of the Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer Starting at 7 PM
According to White House Senior Administration staff the speech is expected to run between 45-50 minutes, almost the same running time as the Presidents last SOTU. Original reports said the speech would be shorter however, the increasing length of the speech is due in part to the fact that the President plans to cover a lot of ground on the international and domestic fronts.
Press Secretary Tony Snow said, that the President will cover the War on Terror but will also focus on domestic issues. Such as, health care, education, immigration, energy and energy security.
I am not expecting much from this speech, I think it will contain a lot of fluff in order to gain more support from the people. Currently over 70% of Americans do not think the President is doing a "good" job. He will probably touch the War on Terror very briefly this will not be a podium to gain support for his new Iraq strategy, I think he will try to shift the focus from foreign policy to domestic policy. The President will ask for bipartisanship and for the Congress to support our troops. A precursor to the bipartisan resolutions circulating through congress in opposition of the President Iraq war strategy.
Expect full commentary following the speech tonight, as well I am trying to attain a copy of the speech before this evenings broadcast which many news outlets will attain.
According to White House Senior Administration staff the speech is expected to run between 45-50 minutes, almost the same running time as the Presidents last SOTU. Original reports said the speech would be shorter however, the increasing length of the speech is due in part to the fact that the President plans to cover a lot of ground on the international and domestic fronts.
Press Secretary Tony Snow said, that the President will cover the War on Terror but will also focus on domestic issues. Such as, health care, education, immigration, energy and energy security.
I am not expecting much from this speech, I think it will contain a lot of fluff in order to gain more support from the people. Currently over 70% of Americans do not think the President is doing a "good" job. He will probably touch the War on Terror very briefly this will not be a podium to gain support for his new Iraq strategy, I think he will try to shift the focus from foreign policy to domestic policy. The President will ask for bipartisanship and for the Congress to support our troops. A precursor to the bipartisan resolutions circulating through congress in opposition of the President Iraq war strategy.
Expect full commentary following the speech tonight, as well I am trying to attain a copy of the speech before this evenings broadcast which many news outlets will attain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)