Friday, April 20, 2007

As of Monday...


As of Monday April 23, 2007 Informed Students is going to be moving to a new spot, http://www.InformedStudents.net.

We will no longer post to here on blogger. Be sure to check out the new site.

Thanks for reading

Informed Students

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Monday, April 16, 2007

Blog The Vote-Presidential Candidates Comment on the Virginia Tech Massacre

As news came in from Virginia Tech University, the Presidential candidates began to release statements concerning the shooting. I feel that gun control will become another hot button campaign issue.

Rudy Giuliani

"On this day of national tragedy, when we lost some of our finest to a senseless act, we stand together as a country to mourn those who lost their lives.

"My thoughts and prayers continue to be with the survivors and the many friends, colleagues and family members of those who perished. May God bless them all."

John McCain

"I am shocked and saddened to hear the news of today's events. This inconceivable tragedy was a horrific act of cruelty that took the lives of so many innocent young people, cutting their lives short and inflicting tremendous pain on all of those who loved them.

"Cindy and I extend our deepest sympathies and prayers to the students, faculty, friends and family of the Virginia Tech community."

John Edwards

We are simply heartbroken by the deaths and injuries suffered at Virginia Tech. We know what an unspeakable, life-changing moment this is for these families and how, in this moment, it is hard to feel anything but overwhelming grief, much less the love and support around you. But the love and support is there. We pray that these families, these students, and the entire Virginia Tech community know that they are being embraced by a nation. There is a Methodist hymn that gave us solace in such a moment as this, and we repeat its final verse here, in hopes it will help these families, as it helped us:

In our end is our beginning; in our time, infinity;
In our doubt there is believing, in our life, eternity,
In our death, a resurrection; at the last, a victory,
Unrevealed until its season, something God alone can see.

Our dearest wish is that this day could start again, with the promise of these young people alive. Knowing that cannot be, our prayer is for God’s grace and whatever measure of peace can be reached on this terrible day.

Hillary Clinton

"I am shocked and saddened by the horrific tragedy at Virginia Tech. My prayers are with the victims and their families, as well as the students, faculty, and community devastated by these gruesome killings. As a parent, I am filled with sorrow for the mothers and fathers and loved ones struggling with the sudden, unbearable news of a lost son or daughter, friend or family member. This tragedy is still unfolding and I hope as a nation we can come together and keep in our thoughts all those affected as we learn more about the events which took place this morning."
Barack Obama
"Today, we are a grieving and shocked nation. Violence has once again taken too many young people from this world. In Blacksburg, they were daughters. They were sons. They were our nation's new leaders. We mourn thm. We will miss them, and we pray for their families and the injured fighting for their lives."
Mitt Romney
"The entire nation grieves for the victims of this terrible tragedy that took place today on the campus of Virginia Tech. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their families and the entire Virginia Tech community. Our full support is behind the law enforcement officials who are involved with stabilizing the situation and conducting an investigation."
What do you think?

Virginia Tech Shooting

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the victims and families of the Virgina Tech University shooting.

The Politicians said on the floor of the Senate,

"We pray for the students and faculty members and families of Virginia Tech community, and do hope for a speedy recovery of the wounded," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, said. "And we pray that America can find the strength, which we will find, for overcome our grief and outrage, as we face yet another tragedy."

"On behalf of this side of the aisle, let me offer my condolences for this unspeakable tragedy to which the majority leader has been referring, and join him in calling for a moment of silence," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, added.

Democrats Losing Support

Support for the Democratic-controlled Congress has slipped eight points since January when Democrats took control of the House and Senate, according to a new CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll.

In January, only 31 percent of Americans believed that the Democrats' policies were taking the country in the wrong direction, but in the new poll released Monday, this number has increased to 39 percent.

Clashes over a wartime emergency spending bill and showdown over the dismissal of several U.S. attorneys are just two of the issues Congress and the White House sparred over.

CNN Poll: Presidential races tighten on both sides

Sen. John McCain has slashed Rudy Giuliani's double-digit lead by 10 points, but the GOP picture gets muddier if former Sen. Fred Thompson or former House Speaker Newt Gingrich enters the race, according to a CNN poll gauging the popularity of 2008 presidential hopefuls. CNN.com reports.

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Blog The Vote-McCain VMI Speech

POST 300

THIS IS THE 300th POST ON INFORMED STUDENTS!!!

Political Cartoon: Imus v Sharpton


What do you think of the cartoon?

Blog The Vote-Barack Obama Calls for Imus Firing From Radio

Democrat Barack Obama on Wednesday became the first presidential candidate to call for radio host Don Imus to be fired for making racially and sexually charged comments about the Rutgers women's basketball team. Read more here.


Wednesday, April 11, 2007

CNN Reports: Fred Thompson has Lymphoma

According to a source close to Fred Thompson, Mr. Thompson has a treatable form of lymphoma, says CNN.

This can hurt his hope to run for President in 2008.

UPDATE:The politico has the full story here.

Video-The Politico: Rudy Giulliani Late Start


Nicole Collins reports on Rudi Giuliani's late start in early voting states - where he leads in the polls despite his lack of social conservative values

Video-Situation Room: McCain v. Obama on Iraq

Blog The Vote- McCain on Iraq

“Democrats, who deny our soldiers the means to prevent an American defeat, have chosen another road,” McCain says in prepared remarks. “It may appear to be the easier course of action but it is a much more reckless one, and it earns them no credit even if it gives them an advantage in the next election. This is an historic choice, with ramifications for Americans not yet born.”

The Politico has the full story here.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Political Cartoon-The Problems of the Internet

Hillary Clinton's Iraq Vote

The Presidential campaign has caused the candidates to reexamine their position on the war in Iraq in the present tense and past tense. Sen. Barack Obama has said that he would not have voted for the war, if he were in the senate. Sen. John Edwards has written an op-ed in the Washington Post, in which he opens with the words "I was wrong." The question on Democratic primary voters is why hasn't Presidential front runner Hillary Clinton apologized for her vote.

Sen. Clintons position for the past several months is that she made the right vote at the time. She said "My decision is influenced by my eight years of experience on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue in the White House, watching my husband deal with serious challenges to our nation. I want this president, or any future president, to be in the strongest possible position to lead our country in the United Nations or in war," explaining her position on the war.

Some believe that Sen. Clintons belief was not a political move but a philosophical belief which she holds deeply. Michael Crowley of The National Republic writes, about an October 10 meeting that Sen. Clinton had with the Council on Foreign Relations. There, in the midst of race for Senate, she took a Presidential position on Foreign Policy.

She discussed that the U.S. should lead coalitions and alliances against such things as poverty, AIDS, and repression. The Senator outlined her belief in the use of force as follows;
There is a refrain ... that we should intervene with force only when we face splendid little wars that we surely can win, preferably by overwhelming force in a relatively short period of time. To those who believe we should become involved only if it is easy to do, I think we have to say that America has never and should not ever shy away from the hard task if it is the right one.
This statement sounds like a Republican to me. I think her vote in 2002 was justified according to the information presented to her. I think it takes a strong person to standby there vote, and that is what she is trying to do rather then back peddle. By no means does this mean I support Senator Clinton, but I do believe she has done the right thing in this situation. Unlike Senator Barack Obama, I would have voted for the war but I believe it has become a mismanaged war by our President, furthermore I believe it is our responsibility to the Iraqi people to fix the problems that we have created in that country. Which is both in our interest and there interest.

What do you think?

Monday, April 09, 2007

Political Cartoon-Civil War: Congress vs. The White House

Political Cartoon-Campaign Fundraising: Hillary v. Obama

Democrat vs. Democrat

Sen. Carl Levin, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman appeared on ABC's "This Week." He went against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Senate "will not stop paying for the Iraq war or relent from insisting that President Bush keep pressing the Baghdad government for a negotiated end to the violence," Sen. Levin said.

Sen. Levin has spent the past few years arguing against the war and calling for a complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Michael Crowley at The Plank believes the Senate Democrats are attempting to play to the multi-personalities that makes up the Democratic party. He says "Are Reid and Levin playing a game of good cop, bad cop? Reid stokes up the base while Levin covers the right flank?"

I would have to agree with Mr. Crowley that the democrats are extremely disunited and that the party leaders recognize this flaw. Therefore they need to play to be able to play to the different parts of the party. They were able to do this in the 2006 Midterm Elections by nominating several moderate democrats and being able to get the Democratic party to unite behind these candidates, they continue to try to play to the overall moderate base by taking multiple positions on key issues.

What do you think?

Apologies for Slavery

I do not want to sound crude when I discuss the new apologies for slavery, but when it was discussed on the New Republic I felt it was an important issue to discuss.

I agree that individual state governments and the federal government should pass resolutions expressing regret and apologies for the institution of slavery. However, I have overheard some discussion of "slavery reparations," I disagree with this idea for one main reason. I do not believe that there is one living individual who was enslaved. Families are able to trace their lineage to former slaves, however they did not suffer and they therefore do not deserve to be paid for others suffering.

Our country and government has larger problems, and handing out money to families of former slaves is not going to change anything. I personally believe this just another way for people to make money off our government, that could be put to good use.

Sunday, April 08, 2007

What to Make of "Underclassmen" Foreign Policy

Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Syria seems to have started a chain of non-State Department officials directly engaging in foreign policy. Gov. Bill Richardson (D) has just gone to North Korea to claim the remains of American soliders from the Korean War (backed by the Bush administration unlike Pelosi's visit). Newt Gingrinch (R), former Speaker of the House, calls Pelosi's and Richardson's visit to these foreign nations dangerous. Breaking with tradition of letting the President's administration handle the foreign diplomacy, he says these leaders have begun to create their own foreign policy agenda for personal gain. While nothing bars them from engaging in talks with other nations, it certainly can demonstrate a divided US government, a sign of weakness to other foreign nations.
Do you think President Bush has lost control (perhaps credibility) in foreign matters? Who should be in charge of foreign diplomacy?
(Photo: zaiusnation.blogspot.com)


Thursday, April 05, 2007

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Political Cartoon

Here is a link to my original post on the No Child Left Behind Act. What do you think?

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Blog The Vote-Giuliani and Forbes

Ryan Sager has the whole story here. The Giuliani Campaign has been quiet for some time now. This deal with Forbes will help Giuliani a lot in the long run.

The connections that Steve Forbes has will help the campaign in the long run. He is fully integrated within the business world and this will help Giuliani achieve fundraising goals.

This is a significant endorsement that will help the Giuliani campaign

Spring Break: Congress goes to Cancun!

Just kidding, but that would be funny to see Chuck Hagel and Nancy Pelosi on MTV's Spring Break. The war spending bill that the President has vowed to veto is going to have to wait till Congress returns from Spring Break (Passover and Easter).

Congress will reconvene April 16, however the funds the President has asked for are desperately needed. As well Congress is no longer debating those funds they are debating the pork that was laid on thick.

The Politco says:

The White House doesn't intend to accept the IOU quietly, accusing the Democratic-controlled Congress of skipping town before its work is done.

"They should stick around until they send him a bill," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. "You can be sure that we won't be shy about talking about that."

And I would agree Democrats realize that the money is needed with or without a withdrawal date. They need to stop delaying things, it is only crushing the American image more so than it already is.

Democrats: Would you like some spinach with your MK47?


I found this picture here. This is in reference to the war appropriations bill that is laden with pork. All I am saying is I understand why its done but this is a little ridiculous.The bill in the House is entitled the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Health, and Iraq Accountability Act, a very patriotic title at that but the bill is nothing but.

Yes, all the bleeding heart liberals and anti-war people are excited cause it sets a date for withdrawal from Iraq. However, it makes a mockery of American politics.

The bill is for $124 billion dollars. $96 billion is going to the troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the question on my mind is where is the other $28 billion going.

I will tell you, the other $28 billion was things added on to the bill in order for House Democrats to get enough votes to pass the bill, by the slimmest majority ever.

The Politico created a Top-10 List of add-ons, read the entire bill if you would like.
--$165,200 to the widow of Rep. Charles Norwood (R-Ga.), a promoter of patients’ rights legislation who died of cancer and lung disease in February, three months after he was reelected.

--$4 million for the Office of Women's Health at the Food and Drug Administration.

--$5 million for tropical fish breeders and transporters for losses from a virus last year.

--$25 million for spinach that growers and handlers were unable to market, up to 75 percent of their losses.

--$50 million “for asbestos abatement and other improvements” to the Capitol Power Plant.

--$60.4 million for the National Marine Fisheries Service, “to be distributed among fishing communities, Indian tribes, individuals, small businesses, including fishermen, fish processors, and related businesses, and other persons for assistance to mitigate the economic and other social effects caused by” a commercial fishery failure.

--$74 million “for the payment of storage, handling, and other associated costs for the 2007 crop of peanuts to ensure proper storage of peanuts for which a loan is made.”

--$120 million for the shrimp and menhaden fishing industries to cover consequences of Hurricane Katrina.

--$283 million for the Milk Income Loss Contract Program.

--$400 million for “wildland fire suppression.”

To me all the add-ons are ridiculous, the President has said he will veto the bill because of the withdrawal date. All the Democrats are doing is delaying funds to our troops. The fact is the bill should have been passed without a withdrawal date, you may not like President Bush but he is right when he says if you set a date for withdrawal all the terrorist will hide in their caves till we leave and then come out and take over. You may say that is not our problem, but it is.

What do you think?

Iran Hostage Situation

The Iranian Foreign Minister said that the 1 female British soldier could be release as early as today or early Thursday.

Earlier British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett announced that the UK would freeze all bilateral business with Tehran until the all sailors and marines are released.

Britain says Iran's detention of the eight Royal Navy sailors and seven Royal Marines, who were conducting a routine inspection of a merchant vessel at the northern end of the Persian Gulf, is illegal and is demanding their release. Iran insists the group was inside its territorial waters. Read more here.


I think that the British are doing to little to deal with the situation, in all seriousness if these would have been American troops, we would probably be working harder diplomatically then the British are. I also feel that President Bush may have decided to use some force to pressure Iran to give them up. What ever the case if this issue is not resolved shortly, we could see World War III in our generation. Why do I say this, Iranian President Amadinejad has declared he wants to destroy the western world, the United States and Israel in particular. If war broke out between Britain, Americas closest ally and Iran, we will see a third front ofthe "War on Terror."

What do you think?

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Monday, March 26, 2007

Blog The Vote-Vilsack Endorses Hillary

“There is no candidate for president who will do a better job of creating a stronger and better America for your children than Hillary Clinton,” Vilsack said at Clinton’s side in Des Moines.

As predicted over the weekend Tom Vilsack, former Presidential candidate has endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton as well he will serve as her campaigns co-chairman.

I think Vilsack may become Clinton Vice President.

What do you think?

Update:
Interested in other endorsments, click here.

U.N. New Sanctions on Iran

Over the week the U.N. Security Council, decided unanimously to impose new stricter sanctions on Iran. The resolution would freeze the assets of 28 additional individuals and organizations involved in Iran's nuclear and missile programs. About a third of those are linked to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, an elite military corps.

The resolution also calls for a voluntary travel embargo on Iranian officials and Revolutionary Guard commanders.

President Ahmadinejad, responded to the new sanctions over the weekend. Ahmadinejad, in an interview with France's Channel 2 TV network, warned nations "seeking to impose sanctions against Iran will suffer a greater damage themselves," IRNA reported.

I agree with the new U.N. Sanctions, the international community needs to use a strong hand when dealing with Iran. They are a threat to international security, that must be dealt with accordingly. I believe we should not use military force for as long as possible, however that may become necessary. It will only work though, if it is a multi-lateral force, and not just an American force.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Blog The Vote- Monday Vilsack to announce...

Tom Vilsack, dropped out of the Presidential race in February however he still holds some power in the Presidential campaign. Who will he endorse?

On Monday Vilsack is expected to make an announcement. Earlier this week the Associated Press reported that Vilsack is likely to endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton.

What will his endorsement mean?

KCCI political analyst Dennis Goldford said it's possible that it will."The 300,000 people who said they'd caucus for him in 2008 may well take that into consideration as they decide where else to go," said Goldford.

I have to agree any former Presidential candidate will hold a lot of clout in the race. Vilsack garnered some significant support early in the campaign season and still holds all those supporters in his back-pocket.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Republicans keep Control

I love reading other bloggers and I just read this great article, about why the Republican minority is still able to control the floor of the House.

I think it shows how strong of a party they were and still continue to be dispite the low approval ratings of the President. They were in control for over a decade and now once placed on the opposite side of the table, they are still trying to stay on top.

Read the article and tell me what you think?

House passes Iraq Bill

The Hill reports that by slim victory (218-212) the House passed a bill that forces the President to bring the troos home by August 2008 or earlier.
The wording was worked into a $124 billion appropriations bill that would fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This is the Democrats strongest stand against the presidents Iraq policy.
The White House has already said it will veto the legislation.
I would agree with the veto, setting a specific date is asking for trouble. I have said in an earlier post that if we set a date for withdrawal, we will see an end of violence until we leave. Once we leave an all-out civil war would break out.
Update 2:17 pm: President Bush responded to the House vote a short while ago. "A narrow majority in the House of Representatives abdicated its responsibility by passing a war spending bill that has no chance of becoming law and brings us no closer to getting the troops the resoures they need to do their job," the president said. I agree with the President the show the democrats continue to put on is hurting the soldiers and not helping to bring an end to the war.
What do you think?

Anti-war protesters arrested at Pelosi’s office

From TheHill.com:
Four members of the anti-war group Code Pink were arrested outside the office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Thursday afternoon, following an announcement that they would seek to take over the office.

The group’s members had planned to hold a symbolic “Pin the war on the Donkey” demonstration at Pelosi’s office to show their frustration with the Democratic leadership’s inaction on ending the war in Iraq.

However, Capitol Police prevented the taping of a drawn donkey to the wall.

Code Pink members were crying outside Pelosi’s office. When asked why, Rae Abileah, 24, said she was crying out of “outrage that this is all we can get from the Democrats,” referring to the Iraq supplemental funding bill, scheduled for a vote Friday.

“We’re just heartbroken that Nancy Pelosi has decided to keep funding George Bush’s war, and now the war belongs to the Democrats as well as the Republicans,” said Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin. “We thought we were going to get a change when they came into power.”

I have been saying this since the blog opened its doors following the 2006 mid-term elections. Anybody who thinks or thought, that once the Democrats took control of congress we would see an automatic withdrawal from Iraq, is crazy. Furthermore any one who says money is the answer to end this war is also crazy. The only answer to this war is success, and that may take longer than anybody expects however we must achieve it and I applaud the democratic leadership for standing strong against those in their party who would like to use the power of the purse to get the troops home, that would make America look more divided then ever.

What do you think?

Blog The Vote-TheHill.com: Clinton: 'It's just not fare'

TheHill.com, reports today about a conference call former President Bill Clinton had with several of his wife supporters.

Sen. Hillary Clinton is trying to combat Sen. Barack Obama, that "anti-war candidate."

Former President Bill Clinton yesterday complained that “it’s just not fair” the way his wife is being depicted for her controversial Iraq war vote. Read more here.

I do not believe that either candidate should be considered anti-war. Sen. Obama has taken a strong stance against the war in Iraq however he has not said he is against war all together. Putting my personal political beliefs aside I feel that putting either them up against either of the two Republican front runners and Democrats wont see a victory in 2008. The Democrats won in 2006 because the found central moderate candidate. Sen. Obama is to far to the left and Sen. Clinton is considered by many to be a hawk, both of which are extremes within the party.

What do you think?

Gates wanted to close Gitmo

According to a story by the NY Times, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates argued to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

He has argued that an legal proceedings held at the facility would look illegitimate. He told President Bush and others that it should be shut down as quickly as possible.

Mr. Gates’s appeal was an effort to turn Mr. Bush’s publicly stated desire to close Guantánamo into a specific plan for action, the officials said. In particular, Mr. Gates urged that trials of terrorism suspects be moved to the United States, both to make them more credible and because Guantánamo’s continued existence hampered the broader war effort, administration officials said.


The article sites that both U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and Vice President Cheney both opposed the plan.

Personally I think it would be helpful for the U.S. to close Gitmo. It has created a tainted view of the way America treats prisoners of war. Trying those held at the facility in the United States, would probably stream line the process. It has taken years to accomplish the trials in Cuba and now we may be able to complete the trials or at least start it.

What do you think?


Gonzalez: You're fired!

House may pass Iraq Funding bill

The House of Representatives looks set to pass a bill that would establish "readiness standards for the deployment of combat forces and an Aug. 31, 2008, deadline for their removal from Iraq," writes the Washington Post. The breakthrough came last night when leaders of the antiwar Out of Iraq Caucus pledged not to block the Nancy Pelosi-led measure. But CNN says that, despite the pledge, the House leadership may still be a few votes short of the 218 needed.

I am very skeptical of this bill as it outlines a deadline for withdrawal. I think the President is correct when he says if we announce an official deadline, terrorists are smart enough to let things subside until that deadline approaches. Then once it hits and the U.S. is gone, they can pick up their activities with no struggle at all.

The other reason I do not like the plan is because it is happening 3 months before the president election and I think their is some sort of democrat ulterior motive.

What do you think?

Blog The Vote- John Edwards Continues the Campaign

Despite the return of his wifes illness, John Edwards has announced that he plans to stays on the campaign. "The campaign goes on. The campaign goes on strongly," Edwards told reporters, his wife by his side.

It will be interesting to see, how is wifes progressing cancer play out along the campaign trail. I believe, depending on how fast it progresses, it could become an issue for the campaign. Edwards will want to be by his wife side, and we could potentially see him dropping out of the race in the next several months.

What do you think?

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Partisan Fishing Expedition

As Karl Rove and other top administration officials are being subpoenaed, I tend to look at the political motives of the Democrats in office.

I feel as if I agree with the congress as they assert their power over the President. The 2006 mid-term election did give them the power to do so. However I think that they are trying to look for things to complain about.

I think President Bush's offer, to allow administration officials to be interviewed behind closed doors and not on tape was a satisfactory offer.

The Associated Press says, Bush had sought to avoid the "media spectacle" that would result from public hearings with Rove and others at the witness table.

I happen to agree with the President that the Democrats in some ways are trying to make the Republican party look worse then they already do.

"The question they've got to ask themselves is, are you more interested in a political spectacle than getting the truth?" Tony Snow said Tuesday, I agree with the position the White House has taken on this issue.

I also agree that the U.S. Congress has the right to do its job by performing oversight over the administration, however they are going about it in the wrong way.

What do you think?

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Political Cartoon

Courtesy of Slate Magazine

Salt Lake City Mayor calls for Bush Impeachment

Read the full story here.

My view on the impeachment of a President especially this President is that one needs to look beyond today. What I mean is that if we impeach President Bush we will then have President Cheney, who may be worse.

The main issue I have with the impeachment process is that it clearly is a waste of time, energy, and tax-dollars. Congress will spend weeks on this issue rather than focusing on issues that are really going to make a difference.

Impeaching a President who was fairly elected by the people of this country in 2004, in my opinion makes America look weak and unstable.

I have taken a moment to remember what it was like during the process for President Clinton. All I can remember is Anna Nicole (R.I.P) type coverage, this over hyped, MTV style coverage of something that is not going to do anything to change Americas future. It would only help take the focus of the American people away from more important issues, like the war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

People who say "if George Bush lost in 2004 we would be out of Iraq," first off you cant make a claim like that because it neither true nor false. As well even if an anti-war candidate is elected in 2008, we will only see a change in strategy not a complete withdrawal. This is not a war America and the world can afford to lose.

What do you think?

Blog The Vote- Obama anti-Hillary You Tube Video

Sen. Barack Obama denied involvement last night on Larry King Live when asked about a video posted on the popular website You Tube, about Sen. Hillary Clinton.

"We knew nothing about it. I just saw it for the first time," Obama said to Larry King "And you know one of the things about the Internet is that people generate all kinds of stuff. In some ways it's the democratization of the campaign process."

To me the video does not look like a campaign advertisement, rather it looks like someone had to much time on their hands. The video can be seen here.

Update 7:43 am Chris Cillizza at The Fix, blogs about the impact of the technology in Presidential elections, here
The YouTube Effect (Part XIII).

Monday, March 19, 2007

Blog The Vote- Obama and Israel

Ben Smith over at the Politco wrote a good article Obama's Rhetoric Chills Some Supporters of Israel.

I think Sen. Obama needs to begin to start working on his wording of what he says. According to his voting record, Sen. Obama has always supported the American-Israel strategic alliance.

I do believe however he needs start thinking about what he says, the pro-Israel community is a strong voting body as well as a strong financial group and most candidates would not like to lose that support. As well if a candidate loses the support of the pro-Israel community, it is likely to lead to the loss of the majority of the Jewish community.

Obama's comments, including "nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people" as a result of the Israeli-Palestinian crisis, in the Des Moines Register. Have really hurt the senator, he needs to begin recognizing the fact that the citizens of Israel are not living in peace and prosperity. Those in the north continue to rebuild, after thousand of rockets destroyed homes that were standing centuries, citizen riding buses to work continue to question if they will make it home at the end of the day.

Anybody who can confidently say that the Palestinian people are suffering more than Israeli is blind to the facts. Both groups are not gaining from this conflict they are both suffering. The problem is that the suffering of the Palestinians is due to the Palestinian government lack of control of its own people.

You cannot blame Israel for the fact that millions of dollars in aide was held back by Yassar Arafat from his own people. The Palestinian government has kept their people in "refugee" camps since the state of Israel was created because it make them look like victims. They are no longer victims. Keeping them in refugee camps enables the Palestinian Authority to continue to blame Israel for the problems of the Palestinian people.

Billion of dollars in foreign aide continues to be kept from the Palestinian government in order to get them to stop working with terrorists groups, like Hamas. The new "unity" government is not going to do anything. Any government that includes a terrorist group, or calls for the destruction of another sovereign state, should not receive aide from other nations.

What do you think?


Thursday, March 15, 2007

American Israel Public Affairs Committee- On my way to the hill!

Reuben Ingber, Joe Lieberman, Mrs. Lieberman

Reuben Ingber on the AIPAC Stage

Brian Tregerman (Albany Student), Sen. Joe Biden, Reuben

Sen. Sam Brownback, Reuben Ingber

Reuben Ingber on the hill

Blog The Vote- Candidates Woo Firefighters

Yesterday, Sen. Clinton, Sen. Obama, Sen. Biden, and Dodd all spoke to firefighters at the International Association of Fire Fighters(IAFF), Presidential forum.

Both Sen. Clinton and Obama were well received, however the tier two candidates, Biden and Dodd were the stars of this show. Biden and Dodd spoke the language of the over 1,000 white-male attendees, according to one union official they spoke in "red-meat and a six-pack" rhetoric.

Over the weekend, I was able to meet Joe Biden, and I think as second tier candidate I believe he may have a shot if he can fundraise his way to the top tier. He has a lot of great ideas and great passion as a Presidential candidate.

It is important to see that the core of American voters are white-males and that I think will play a very big role. Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama are both candidates that I do not think most white males will continue to open up to. They may look to other candidates like John Edwards and Joe Biden.

Friday, March 09, 2007

House Legislation Comes With a Catch


Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D - Calif.) and gang have come up with a plan to pay for Iraq, which includes a plan to bring the troops back home. The White House has already exclaimed that they will veto this legislation even through it grants President Bush the much needed funding he has asked for Iraq. Sticking to his guns, the President will not allow Congress to set a timetable for Iraq. Supporters of the notion say it will cause failure in Iraq, and that simply will be a win for the terrorists.

The Democrats know very well that it will be close to impossible to override a veto with their slim majority in the Senate. Then why do they continuously waste time on bills they know will be vetoed? To make a point? Certainly, now they'll have a track record to show their support to bring troops back in time for the 2008 elections. As a wise man once told me, the job of an elected official, is to get elected.


Waste of time? Or are they sincerely working for the best interests of the people?

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Dear Readers,

It has been a very difficult week at school and that is why I have not been posting. However this weekend I will be back in business, reporting live from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference in Washington. There will be pictures and hopefully interviews with several people who are attending the conference.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Blog the Vote - Don't Forget the Hispanics


Just this past weekend Presidential Candidates Barack Obama (D-IL) and Hillary Clinton (D-NY) paid homage to civil rights activists in Selma, Alabama. Trying to garner what has been a tug-of-war for the black vote, these democratic candidates are forgetting another essential group - the Papi's. As you may have heard, the Hispanic population in the US has surpassed the black population. Then why are these candidates still fighting for the black votes? Both groups have similar turnouts at presidential elections. The next presidential election may be even more motivating for the Hispanics with the issue of immigration still on the table that may result in a higher turnout.

Democratic Presidential Candidate Bill Richardson, the only candidate with ties to a Hispanic background, has managed to keep a low profile thus-far. But his popularity may only grow over time. Remember, the past few elections have shown how the front-runners, come election time are no longer in the running.
Do you think it's critical to focus on the hispanic vote?

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Blog The Vote- Giuliani appointed Democratic Judges

The Politico Reports:

When Rudy Giuliani faces Republicans concerned about his support of gay rights and legal abortion, he reassures them that he is a conservative on the decisions that matter most.

"I would want judges who are strict constructionists because I am," he told South Carolina Republicans last month. "Those are the kinds of justices I would appoint -- Scalia, Alito and Roberts."

But most of Giuliani's judicial appointments during his eight years as mayor of New York were hardly in the model of Chief Justice John Roberts or Samuel Alito -- much less aggressive conservatives in the mold of Antonin Scalia.

I do not believe that Giuliani will ever be able to use his resume as a way to back his candidacy for the Republican nomination. Being a republican in New York is basically like being a Democrat across the rest of the country. Giuliani will never fit the national Republican-Conservative mold, and in order to win in a primary you need to fit that mold.

Political Cartoon-"The Worlds Local Bank"

This cartoon reminds of my issue with HSBC, a bank which calls itself "The Worlds Local Bank." At the "worlds local bank," I expect to get my answers from someone locally who can speak English well, I no I am not perfect when it comes to grammar. However, I am fully able to hold a conversation without stumbling. When I call the "worlds local bank," I ask myself why can't I speak to someone who is capable of speaking proper english?

People claim that they do this in order to provide 24-hour support, in order to account for the time difference. Well, why can't I speak to an American between the hours of 8 am to 8 pm.

What do you think?

Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid Update

12:02 AM--Senator McCain has officially announced his bid for President on David Letterman. A more formal announcement will happen on his tour in April.

As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.

A video will be posted shortly.

Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid Update

12:02 AM--Senator McCain has officially announced his bid for President on David Letterman. A more formal announcement will happen on his tour in April.

As you all know, I do in deed support the Senator and would like to hear your opinion on the Senators presidential bid.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Blog The Vote- McCain Announces Presidential Bid

Republican Sen. John McCain will officially enter the presidential race his second run after a bitter loss to George W. Bush in 2000 with a formal announcement in early April.

The Arizona senator disclosed the timing of the long-expected announcement in a taping for the “Late Show With David Letterman” on CBS for airing Wednesday night.

“I am announcing that I will be a candidate for president of the United States,” the senator told the talk show host and then added he would give a formal speech to that effect in early April. Read the full story here.

Democrats Disunion

The Politico says that several Democrats are upset with the way Democratic leaders have handled Iraq war policy.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday postponed for at least a week action on a Democratic plan to rewrite the 2002 congressional resolution authorizing the war, imposing new wartime restrictions on the administration.

Sen. Ben Nelson, a conservative Democrat from Nebraska, said the new Democratic strategy could unfairly hamstring the president and military commanders. "I think it is very difficult to start changing things after the fact and still avoid micromanaging the war."

And Sen. Russ Feingold, a liberal Democrat from Wisconsin, criticized the latest Democratic strategy as too timid and toothless in stopping the war. Approving a new authorization resolution would be the same "as voting for a new Iraq war and that I am not going to do."

This is the problem with the Democratic party, they are not united in their goals and aspirations. Some Democrats would like to cut funding for the war, others want a time table et cetera. In order to achieve anything Democrats need to come together under one banner. Their disunion is only going to hurt them in the long run.

What do you think?


"Better late than never."

"Better late than never," said Leon E. Panetta, a onetime White House chief of staff who served on the Iraq Study Group, when she was asked about scheduled regional conference with Iraq two neighbors Syria and Iran.

The United States where also invited to these talks however will not be the ones running the talks. However, the Iraqi government has called the meeting and will head the meetings, contrary to the recommendations of the panel.

Democrats heralded the plan as a needed change in policy. Sen. Joseph R. Biden said, that "the administration is right to reverse itself and engage Iran and Syria on Iraq. Right now they're a big part of the problem, but they have an interest in becoming part of the solution to prevent chaos in Iraq."

Personally I feel that this is good on many levels. The first is that it shows that the United States recognizes the problems which exist in Syria and Iran and that we will need to help to fix the problem in a diplomatic way. The second and more important is that the Iraqi government is taking a primary role in these talks. It shows that the Iraqi government wants to take control of their country.

What do you think?

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Joe Lieberman Part II

Well I think Sen. Lieberman is a really smart, although I do not believe he will ever switch political parties, I feel he is bluffing. I think however he is using his position, as an independent to ensure that the congress continues to support our troops.

The Democrats would be crazy to call his bluff, they do not under any circumstances want to lose their majority status in the Senate. Lieberman knows this fact very well and has used it to his advantage.

What do you think?

ACCORDING TO THE POLITICO: Lieberman Says War Vote Could Prompt Party Switch

The Politico Reports:
Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut told the Politico Thursday that he has no immediate plans to switch parties, but suggested Democratic opposition to funding the war in Iraq might change his mind.

Lieberman, a registered independent who caucuses with Democrats, has been among the strongest supporters of the war and President Bush’s plan to send another 21,500 combat troops into Iraq to help quell the violence there.

"I have no desire to change parties," Lieberman said in a telephone interview. "If that ever happens, it is because I feel the majority of Democrats have gone in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with."

Asked whether that hasn't already happened with Iraq, Lieberman said: "We will see how that plays out in the coming months," specifically how the party approaches the issue of continued funding for the war.

He suggested, however, that the forthcoming showdown over new funding could be a deciding factor that would lure him to the Republican Party.

"I hope we don't get to that point," Lieberman said. "That's about all I will say on it today. That would hurt."

Republicans have long targeted Lieberman to switch – a move that would give them control of the Senate. And Time magazine is set to report Friday that there is a “remote” chance Lieberman would join the GOP.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Blog The Vote- Romney 1st Campaign Ad



The 60 second advertisement will air in Florida, Iowa, Michigan, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Johnathan Martin at the Politico has the full story.

Great Britian withdraws troops from Iraq

This morning Tony Blair, the British Prime Minister, announced that they will begin with drawing British troops from the southern region of Iraq.

I continue to support the war in Iraq, however as more of our allies begin to pull their troops out, we are no longer fighting a global war on terror but an American war on terror which makes no sense. When we went into Vietnam, we went with a strong coalition which shared the economic costs, life costs, and military costs, in fact the United States made money. The fact of the matter is though that this is not a war that can be solved through a two state division of Iraq, it must end with a "peaceful" and "stable" Iraq. If we cannot help the Iraqi government to accomplish that then there is no hope for peace and stability in the Middle East.

Monday, February 19, 2007

Political Cartoon on Slate.com

This cartoon is great!!!!

Blog The Vote- Romney supports "don't ask, don't tell"

The Washington Post reports:
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney (R), who once advocated allowing gays to serve openly in the military, said yesterday that he does not think the Pentagon should change its "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the midst of the Iraq war.

" 'Don't ask, don't tell' has worked well. We're in the middle of a conflict. Now is not the time for a change in that regard, and I don't have a policy posture as to allowing gays in the military to serve there openly," Romney, a presidential candidate, said on ABC's "This Week."

This is why I don't like Mitt Romney as a Republican candidate for President. He is not standing by what he has been saying, he is continuously changing his opinion on the social issues which drive American voters. People tend to care less for important political issues like education funding, defense policies, et cetera and care more about issue that impact their everyday life. Romney is doing the same thing that John Kerry did in 2004 flip-flopping and it will cause his demise for the nomination.

Blog The Vote- McCain hits the campaign trail hard

Over the weekend Sen. John McCain hit the campaign trail harder than he had in his 2000 campaign. He spent the weekend in predominantly in Iowa and South Carolina.

For most of the weekend he spent combating question on the Iraq Policy which he has promoted for years and now is held hostage by. McCain has spent the past several years urging congress and the President to increase the number of troops in Iraq, saying that it is our only option for victory and an end to the war.

Now that the President has put that plan into action for McCains sake it must work. Otherwise his aspirations for 2008 have been shot down.

The other major topic impacting the Republican race is abortion. Other contenders, like the pro-choice Giuliani and born-again pro-life Romney, do not sit well with the majority of Republican voters who are opposed to abortion and think that legislation needs to be passed prohibiting it.

McCain on the other hand came out this weekend in front of a large crowd in South Carolina saying that he wants to see Roe v. Wade overturned.

I feel that McCain is the Republicans best chance at victory in 2008. The other two front runners, Romney and Giuliani do not have the same political backing that McCain has. He has been on the national stage for many years and his experience far outweighs them.

Blog the Vote-Information

For the best and most up to the minute campaign coverage check out The Politico, its a new site and DC newspaper. It is in my opinion the best in Politics coverage.

Rice at the Middle East Summit

CNN.com reports:
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice held "productive" talks Monday with Israeli and Palestinian leaders and said she expects more negotiations in a bid to restart the Mideast peace process.
Rice's meeting Monday with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas came amid concerns about whether a new Palestinian unity government will renounce terrorism and recognize Israel.

Rice called the meeting "productive and useful," I consider them a waste of money and time at this point. Until the Palestinian "government" recognizes Israels right to exist and renounces violence the Middle East will continue to be at the stalemate its been in for years. Until that happens Israel has the right to be on the defensive against terrorism and any threat that may arise. These meeting are meant to make progress, all I see is a continuation of lies.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Informed Students

Dear Readers,

The blizzard up in Albany, NY where I attend school, has interupted my internet connection. I finally have it again and hope to get some posts up today or tomorrow from home. Keep reading the blog, this weekends Senate vote on the Iraq resolution will be very interesting especially as interrupts campaigning for the ALL the 2008 hopefuls. I will be sure to keep you posted of the developments through the weekend.

The question I pose to all of you is what do you think of the Iraq resolution? Will it do anything?

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Political Cartoon on Slate.com


I found this one and it pretty much says what I am expecting tonight as far as weather goes. LOTS OF SNOW, HERE IN ALBANY!!!

Gov. Romney Enters the Race

Mitt Romney stood in front of a large crowd in Michigan at the Henry Ford Museum to announce his candidacy for President. After the announcement Romney will kick off a four day six-state announcement tour, where he will try to boost his credentials with conservative voters. Romney's, religious views as a Mormon will affect his campaign.

Romney talked about Henry Fords innovation and how that had changed America forever, as well continued innovation will change us forever. "Innovation and transformation has been at the heart of American success" and it is needed in American government now more than ever. "It is time for innovation and transformation in Washington," Romney said he continued on with this theme and how Washington needs to be changed from the outside by people who have experienced the real world.

With his family at his side, Romney said that he "declared his intention to run for President of the United States."

Romeny announces his bid for President

A little after 9 a.m. Former Gov. Mitt Romney is expected to announced his run for president.

House votes on Iraq

The House of Representatives will debate a resolution opposing the Bush build up of troops. In short the resolution says that congress oppose the increase of US troops but will continue to support the troops in Iraq.
The Democratic resolution, just 10 lines in length, will frame three days of debate on the war, culminating in an expected vote Friday to put the House on record against President Bush's decision to deploy more than 20,000 additional U.S. combat troops to Iraq. In two short paragraphs, the resolution affirms Congress's support for "the members of the United States Armed Forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq" before breaking with the president's new strategy. Read more
I have to say that this resolution does nothing at all, except oppose the Presidents new plan. It offers nothing such as another option, or a way for congress to do anything against the troop build up. It is disgusting that the Democrats would do what they are going to do, they are doing something that will make themselves look good in front of ignorant voters. Americans will see that they passed a resolution against the war. I believe that unless the Democrats offer a new plan for victory, not a withdrawal plan then they should not do anything. I say "not a withdrawal plan" because that is not a plan. This is not Vietnam which was an individual situation, if we pulled out of Iraq several nations would be placed in a Middle East power struggle, which would probably end in a multinational war in the Middle East.

Amhadinejad = No Fear

The Guardian discussed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads, comments and his shrugging "off the threat of the a US attack and said accusations that Tehran was arming insurgents in Iraq represented an attempt to find a scapegoat for American "defeats and failures".

U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.

I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.

Amhadinejad = No Fear

The Guardian discussed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejads, comments and his shrugging "off the threat of the a US attack and said accusations that Tehran was arming insurgents in Iraq represented an attempt to find a scapegoat for American "defeats and failures".

U.S. Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that "evidence to the effect that there's been the shipment of weaponry, lethal weaponry, into Iraq, some of it of Iranian provenance. And this is something that we think if the president of Iran wants to put a stop to it, we wish him luck and hope he'll do it real soon." He expressed that this is not a way to pave an offensive war against Iran.

I think that it will be disastrous for the United States to enter into an armed conflict with the Iranians at this time. However I think it would be suicide for the United Nations to leave them be, sanctions and multilateral diplomacy is necessary to deal with the Iranian threat, I emphasize threat. Anyone who believes Iran is not a growing threat to Americans home and abroad and American interests in the region is ignorant to the facts. As well Iran's Presidents consistent calls for the destruction of Israel also poses a threat to stability in the region and to the sole democracy in the region.

N. Korea Stops Nuclear Armament

The N.Y. Times says:
North Korea agreed Tuesday after arduous talks to shut down its main nuclear reactor and eventually dismantle its atomic weapons program, just four months after the communist state shocked the world by testing a nuclear bomb.

The deal marks the first concrete plan for disarmament in more than three years of six-nation negotiations, and could potentially herald a new era of cooperation in the region with the North's longtime foes -- the United States and Japan -- also agreeing to discuss normalizing relations with Pyongyang.

This is a step in the right direction for the world, bringing an end to nuclear weapons in North Korea shows that in some instances diplomatic talks works. I think however we will have to see how this affect U.S. Foreign policy in general.

John Bolton, former U.N. Ambassador says that this is similar to the deal that the Clinton administration tried to make in the ending days of his administration. The Chief U.S. Negotiator told CNN's American Morning, that this is different because this was not a "bilateral" agreement but an agreement between North Korea, its neighbors and the United States.


Saturday, February 10, 2007

Obama announcement Video

Click here to see Obamas announcments in Illinois

Obama Video

Click here to see Obama's pre-announcement video

Blog the Vote- Obama announces his bid for President


Its official early Saturday morning in front of a large crowd where President Lincoln "called on a divided house to stand together," Sen. Barack Obama announced he is running for the democratic nomination.

Obama said in his speech that "people who love their country can change it," and thats what he wants to do.

Friday, February 09, 2007

A Political Cartoon for the Weekend


Romney concedes: War was mismanaged

The Assoiciated Press reports
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney conceded that the war in Iraq has been poorly managed and may hurt Republicans again next year, but he refused to oppose the course President Bush has charted.
I would have to agree with Romney. The war has been mismanaged to this point however I think Romney is right not to oppose the new course because it is completely brand new. It seems to be the only viable option for "victory," the American people and members of Congress should give it an opportunity to work. If you don't we are still in a "poorly managed" war, the tables may change.

What do you think?

Blog The Vote- Gore Supporters Meet Without Gore

CNN Political Ticker says:
Some Al Gore supporters apparently aren't taking "no" for an answer.

They're plotting to get him into the 2008 presidential race, although he's repeatedly said he's not running.

Gore's top policy adviser from his 2000 presidential bid and other key supporters met in Boston today to mull a potential Gore campaign.

They say the former vice president wasn't involved in the meeting.

I highly doubt that Al Gore will run for President, I do not believe he has the will and drive to run for president again. If he did he would have done so again in 2004.

Hamas and Fatah sign Peace Agreement

The rival Palestinian powers signed a peace agreement late Thursday, that would create a National Unity government controlled by Fatah and Hamas, the NY Times Reported. This could mean great things for the region, however unless they end Hamas' terrorist way they are going to get no where.

The National Unity government is not going to be successful until it recognizes the State of Israel and its right to exist. U.S. and other foreign aide will continue to be withheld until the Palestinian Authority does so. The Unity government will do very little in terms of the Israel--Palestinian Conflict.
New posts at 10 a.m.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Political Cartoon on Slate.com



Pelosi's Palace in the Sky

I tend not to read the New York Post however they had an article online today which cited that the plane requested by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi costs tax payers $22,000 an hour to operate.

The U.S. Air Force say it has offered Pelosi a different plane (C-21 Executive Jet) that operates at only $900 an hour. Pelosi's predecessor Dennis Hastert used the same plane following 9/11 when additional security for the person second in line to president was needed.

Pelosi's issue with the C-21 Executive Jet is that it must refuel enroute to San Francisco, her home town. I would have to agree with Pelosi (for once), politicians need to get back to their districts as quickly and efficiently as possible. Stopping to refuel make her trip longer, members of Congress need to spend time in their districts and on the hill. They need to be able to make this almost weekly trips as easy as possible. If she took a commercial flight she would be able to fly from Washington to San Francisco in 7 hours stopping to refuel would force the trip to at least 10 hours, almost an entire business day. The time saved by the larger plane outweighs the cost, more business will be able to be conducted.

What do you think?

Insurgents Changing Tactics?

Over the past 3 weeks six helicopters have gone down in Iraq, many are speculating that Iraqi insurgents are changing to more aggressive and intelligent tactics.

American officials told the NY Time that the streak strongly suggests that insurgents have adapted their tactics and are now putting more effort into shooting down the aircraft.

This was the sixth helicopter to be shot down in the last three weeks: "The helicopter was flying and passed over us, then we heard the firing of a missile," an eyewitness told the Independent.

I think that insurgents are changing their tactics because they have run out of options and are scrambling for victory. I think that we will see a great topple of the insurgency in the coming months.

7 Republicans Push for a Vote on Iraq War Resolution

CNN.com reports that yesterday several anti-troop surge GOP senators lead by Sen. John Warner circulated a letter to leading Democrats and Republicans, saying the "current stalemate" over the Iraq resolutions is "unacceptable" and they intend to offer the Levin-Warner resolution "disagreeing" with the increase in troops to future bills coming before the Senate.

"We strongly believe the Senate should be allowed to work its will on our resolution as well as on the concepts brought forward by other senators," Warner said on the Senate floor, reading from the letter. "Monday's procedural vote should not be interpreted as any lessening of our resolve to go forward advocating the concepts" of the resolution.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Sen. John McCain offers his own Iraq Resolution

Sen. John McCain released a resolution backed by Sen. Lieberman, Sen. Graham, Sen. Cornyn, Sen. Hutchison, Sen. Domenici, Sen. Thune, Sen. Hatch, and Sen. Roberts. The resolution creates 11 benchmarks which the Iraqi government must meet as well as supports the presidents troop build up.

"In order for us to have a solid chance of success in Iraq, both Americans and Iraqis must fulfill certain responsibilities," McCain said.

The Senate resolution calls on on Congress to provide the U.S. troops the necessary support that would allow General Petraeus to carry out the U.S. mission in Iraq.

The benchmarks built into the resolution enables the U.S. to see if the new strategy in Iraq is working. Sen. McCain told ABC's "This Week," that:
the consequences are obvious. I mean, if they’re not meeting those benchmarks, then obviously the new strategy isn’t succeeding. And I can’t tell you what the other options are, because there are no good options to this. If there was a good option to what we’re doing, to sending more young Americans in harm’s way, I’d tell you. They’re all bad options, in my view, if this one isn’t supported and succeeds.
He estimated that it will only take a few months for us to see success from the new strategy and determine whether the Iraqi government was assuming more responsibility and moving toward both economic and political stability.

Their is no option for further defeat in Iraq, the Americans and Iraqi forces need to overcome and beat the insurgents. If not we have taken a million steps backward and we are just sitting ducks for another attack on Americans. McCain's resolution offers the check, that congress has been looking for in order to hold power over congress. Those who claim the only power congress holds now is that of the purse--are wrong. Congress cannot and will not withhold funds from the troops, the American people will not stand for it.

Power Struggle in the Middle East

The Middle East is on the brink of all out Civil War, said Syrian President Bashar Assad. In Lebanon Hizbullah is gearing up to fight the democratic government, in the Palestinian territories if scheduled peace talks fail Hamas and Fatah are ready to go to war. Someone will gain from these conflict the Saudi's fear that Iran may act on these conflicts to grasp hold of power in the region.

"With the prospect of three civil wars looming over the Middle East — and Iran poised to gain from them all — Saudi Arabia has abandoned its behind-the-scenes checkbook diplomacy and taken on a central, aggressive role in reshaping the region’s conflicts," said the New York Times. If the Saudis are unable to take control of the region, Syrian President Bashar Assad is ready to do so.

The Syrian leader told ABC News that he is ready to sit and talk with the United States although he lacks confidence in such talks. He does not think that Washington will consider meeting although it could be the "last chance" to avoid civil war. Assad feels that the Presidents administration does not have the will or "vision" for peace in Iraq and the region. He pointed out, that the President father had the "will to achieve the peace in the region."

Assad said Syria could play an important role in "supporting the dialogue between the different parties inside Iraq with the support from the other parties like the Americans and the other neighboring countries..."

The region is a powder keg ready to explode at a moments notice. The countries heading towards civil war really need to resolve their conflicts before the race for power grows to--imperialism, which is what will happen. As these countries begin to engage in Civil War, we will begin to see the Iranians, the Saudis, and the Syrians taking an active role in these areas and one force will over take the rest. We could experience another power like the U.S.S.R. The one I am describing, a superpower controlled by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is far more dangerous than U.S.S.R. ever was.


What do you think?

Blog The Vote- Giulliani says he can win.

Monday, former New York City mayor and republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giulliani filed the necessary paper work to announce his bid for President in 2008.

Rudy told Fox News' Hannity and Colmes that he is in to win and that all the candidates are good people. He also offered his perspective on the war on Terror. He said that the "war on terror" is a war we must win and we must consider the other forces in the region.

Giulliani cited that we must put pressure on Iran and that we are facing the same dilemma we faced during the cold war. Nuclear arms cannot be in the hands of an irrational person.

Rudy maybe the moderate that many Americans are looking for.

What do you think?

Monday, February 05, 2007

Republicans Block Troop Build-up resolution

The Republican minority was successful today in blocking a Senate resolution against the surge in troops.

"We must heed the results of the November elections and the wishes of the American people," told Majority Leader Harry Reid to ABC News.

The vote was 49-47, 60 short of the required majority to pass a resolution. This is can be deemed both a success and failure for America. It continues to illustrate the great divide in American society about the war and the surge in troops. I think it is really important for the Senate to support the troops, the resolution in my opinion is doing the opposite.


Republicans block the anti-War resolution

Senate Republican leaders Friday threatened to block the Senate from taking up a bill that would put the chamber on record disagreeing with President Bush's troop increase in Iraq unless Democrats agree to allow Republicans to offer alternatives to the measure, reports CNN.com

The possibility of a filibuster does not surprise me. This is a long needed debate on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Congress can pass any resolution for or against the war and it would be fine with me if and only if members backing the anti-war resolution offered their own plan for success. If you cannot offer an alternative then you should support the only plan currently on the table.

The African American Vote=Key to Democrats Nomination

The Politico Reports: A key supporter of Illinois Sen. Barack Obama urged united African-American support for his presidential bid, questioning whether black Democrats still "owe" Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton their support, according to several people who attended a meeting of black Democratic politicians.
The comments by Illinois Senate President Emil Jones Jr., which he confirmed Saturday, angered Clinton backers and deepened a sharp rift among African-American political activists.

This is exactly what Republicans would want if Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama split the African-American vote it will be difficult for them to get through the primary. The Democrats will nominate a less then qualified candidate, more likely a candidate that can't win on the national stage. The only Democrats capable of competing in a national election are Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton. The former is the strongest, Obama in my opinion is riding a wave of stardom that will not likely last through a Presidential election.

The Baghdad Operational Command

Col. Douglass Heckman, the senior adviser to the 9th Iraqi Army Division told CNN "Officially the Baghdad Operational Command takes over tomorrow, so the expectation is that the plan will be implemented soon thereafter, very soon thereafter."

Although U.S. source have said the plan will gradually go into effect, big changes on the ground are expected to occur throughout Monday. The pressure on insurgents will increase as the days go on forcing the insurgent to submission

Thousands of U.S. and Iraqi reinforcements already were in place for the neighborhood-by-neighborhood sweep to clamp off the violence by Sunni insurgents and Shiite militia.

He declined to give precise numbers, although U.S. President George W. Bush has ordered 21,500 additional troops to Iraq by the end of May.

I think we will see great changes in Iraq by the end of May. As the surge in troops grow and the new strategy on the ground goes into effect the American people will see what we have been waiting for success in Iraq.

What do you think?